Superfund Tax

Senate Roll Call Vote 45

2004 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

Yes

Votes For

44

Votes Against

52

Not Voting

4

Since its creation in 1980, the landmark Superfund law has assured the cleanup of more than 900 sites across the country. The law was based on the principle that polluters, not taxpayers, should pay to clean up the toxic waste they create–in part by contributing to a trust fund. However, these fees expired in 1996, and the trust fund has dwindled from $3.8 billion in 1996 to almost nothing today. Taxpayers are now paying more than 80 percent of the cleanup bills, and the number of Superfund sites has grown to more than 1,500, with hundreds more expected to be added in the next decade. The public health ramifications are enormous. Today, nearly 70 million citizens–including 10 million children–live within four miles of a Superfund site.

Under the Bush Administration, the number of sites cleaned up per year has been cut in half, from an average of 76 per year under President Clinton to less than 40 per year today. And according to a 2004 General Accounting Office report, Superfund appropriations have declined 35 percent in real terms since 1993. During consideration of the Senate budget resolution, S. Con. Res. 95, Senators Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ), Barbara Boxer (D-CA), Jon Corzine (D-NJ) and Jim Jeffords (I-VT) introduced Senate Amendment 2703 to reinstate some $1.7 billion in revenues from Superfund fees. On March 11, 2004, the Senate rejected the amendment by a 44-52 vote (Senate roll call vote 45). YES is the pro-environment vote.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Alaska
2025 State Scorecard Average

11%

Arizona
2025 State Scorecard Average

89%

Arkansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

California
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Colorado
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

Connecticut
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Delaware
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Florida
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Georgia
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

Hawaii
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Idaho
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Illinois
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Indiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Iowa
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Kansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Kentucky
2025 State Scorecard Average

6%

Louisiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Maine
2025 State Scorecard Average

63%

Maryland
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Massachusetts
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Michigan
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Minnesota
2025 State Scorecard Average

94%

Mississippi
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Missouri
2025 State Scorecard Average

4%

Montana
2025 State Scorecard Average

6%

Nebraska
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Nevada
2025 State Scorecard Average

94%

New Hampshire
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

New Jersey
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

New Mexico
2025 State Scorecard Average

94%

New York
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

North Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

6%

North Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Oklahoma
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Oregon
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Pennsylvania
2025 State Scorecard Average

40%

Rhode Island
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

South Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

South Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Tennessee
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Texas
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Utah
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Vermont
2025 State Scorecard Average

96%

Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Washington
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

West Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Wisconsin
2025 State Scorecard Average

49%

Wyoming
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%