Fuel Economy

Senate Roll Call Vote 309

2003 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

Yes

Votes For

32

Votes Against

65

Not Voting

3

America’s cars and light trucks consume 8 million barrels of oil every day–more than 40 percent of total U.S. oil consumption. Each gallon of gasoline burned produces 28 pounds of carbon dioxide, the primary contributor to global warming. American vehicles account for 20 percent of U.S. carbon dioxide emissions–and the U.S. is the largest global warming polluter on the planet. The U.S. could substantially reduce both its dependence on oil and its carbon dioxide emissions by raising the miles-per-gallon of new cars and trucks.

Under the corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) standards, each manufacturer’s fleet of light trucks, including sport utility vehicles (SUVs), minivans and pickup trucks, is required to meet a standard of only 20.7 miles per gallon; cars must meet a higher 27.5 miles per gallon standard. Despite significant technological advances, no administration or Congress has significantly raised these CAFE standards in more than two decades. The Bush administration recently announced a small increase in the light truck standards, from 20.7 to 22.2 mpg by 2007. As increasing numbers of gas-guzzling SUVs and other light trucks have replaced cars on the nation’s highways, the fuel economy of new vehicles has sunk to its lowest level since 1980.

During consideration of the Senate energy bill (S. 14), Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) proposed an amendment to raise the CAFE standard for cars and light trucks to 40 miles per gallon by 2015. The amendment included an exception for pickup trucks, which would have to achieve only 27.5 miles per gallon by 2015. This improvement would have saved 3.1 million barrels of oil a day–combined, as much oil as the U.S. currently imports from the Persian Gulf and could extract from the Arctic refuge and the California outer continental shelf–and would have prevented the release of more than 500 million tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.

On July 29, 2003, the Senate rejected the Durbin amendment by a 32-65 vote (Senate roll call vote 309). YES is the pro-environment vote. The Senate instead passed the an amendment sponsored by Senators Bond (R-MO) and Levin (D-MI) to extend an expiring loophole that allows automakers to make fewer high-mileage cars if they make vehicles that are capable of running on both ethanol and gasoline. But because few of these vehicles actually run on ethanol, in part because less than 200 of the nation’s 176,000 gas stations carry ethanol, the amendment would actually increase oil dependence by at least 9 billion gallons of oil by 2008, according to the Bush administration’s own research. The Bond-Levin amendment also added new hurdles for the Department of Transportation to surmount when setting future CAFE standards. This amendment was included in the House-Senate conference report of the energy bill, which has been approved by the House but not the Senate.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2003 State Scorecard Average

0%

Alaska
2003 State Scorecard Average

0%

Arizona
2003 State Scorecard Average

56%

Arkansas
2003 State Scorecard Average

0%

California
2003 State Scorecard Average

99%

Colorado
2003 State Scorecard Average

100%

Connecticut
2003 State Scorecard Average

100%

Delaware
2003 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
2003 State Scorecard Average

0%

Georgia
2003 State Scorecard Average

94%

Hawaii
2003 State Scorecard Average

100%

Idaho
2003 State Scorecard Average

0%

Illinois
2003 State Scorecard Average

100%

Indiana
2003 State Scorecard Average

0%

Iowa
2003 State Scorecard Average

0%

Kansas
2003 State Scorecard Average

0%

Kentucky
2003 State Scorecard Average

6%

Louisiana
2003 State Scorecard Average

0%

Maine
2003 State Scorecard Average

50%

Maryland
2003 State Scorecard Average

100%

Massachusetts
2003 State Scorecard Average

100%

Michigan
2003 State Scorecard Average

100%

Minnesota
2003 State Scorecard Average

100%

Mississippi
2003 State Scorecard Average

0%

Missouri
2003 State Scorecard Average

0%

Montana
2003 State Scorecard Average

29%

Nebraska
2003 State Scorecard Average

0%

Nevada
2003 State Scorecard Average

100%

New Hampshire
2003 State Scorecard Average

100%

New Jersey
2003 State Scorecard Average

88%

New Mexico
2003 State Scorecard Average

100%

New York
2003 State Scorecard Average

100%

North Carolina
2003 State Scorecard Average

0%

North Dakota
2003 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2003 State Scorecard Average

25%

Oklahoma
2003 State Scorecard Average

0%

Oregon
2003 State Scorecard Average

100%

Pennsylvania
2003 State Scorecard Average

94%

Rhode Island
2003 State Scorecard Average

100%

South Carolina
2003 State Scorecard Average

0%

South Dakota
2003 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
2003 State Scorecard Average

0%

Texas
2003 State Scorecard Average

0%

Utah
2003 State Scorecard Average

2%

Vermont
2003 State Scorecard Average

94%

Virginia
2003 State Scorecard Average

100%

Washington
2003 State Scorecard Average

100%

West Virginia
2003 State Scorecard Average

6%

Wisconsin
2003 State Scorecard Average

50%

Wyoming
2003 State Scorecard Average

0%