Nuclear Waste Cleanup

Senate Roll Call Vote 107

2004 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

Yes

Votes For

48

Votes Against

48

Not Voting

4

The Department of Energy is responsible for cleaning up 253 underground tanks containing approximately 100 million gallons of high-level nuclear waste in Washington state, Idaho, South Carolina and New York. Many of these highly toxic tanks have already begun leaking. In recent years, however, the Energy Department has found a way to leave the waste in these tanks by using an internal rule to “re-classify” high-level radioactive waste as “waste incidental to reprocessing.”

In July 2003, a federal district court declared this reclassification system illegal. Nevertheless, the Senate version of the defense authorization bill, S. 2400, included a provision–supported by Senator Lindsay Graham (R-SC)–that would allow the Defense Department to reclassify the high-level nuclear waste left in underground storage tanks in South Carolina. Opponents argued that this could abandon millions of gallons of highly toxic waste in leaking underground storage tanks and would set an alarming precedent for similar nuclear waste cleanup sites in Idaho and Washington state. Senator Maria Cantwell (D-WA) introduced Senate Amendment 3261 to strike the provision from the bill. On June 3, 2004, the amendment failed on a 48-48 tie vote (Senate roll call vote 107). YES is the pro-environment vote. While the House version of the bill did not contain the provision, the reclassification system was included in the conference report which was passed by both the House and Senate and signed into law.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Alaska
2025 State Scorecard Average

11%

Arizona
2025 State Scorecard Average

89%

Arkansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

California
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Colorado
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

Connecticut
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Delaware
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Florida
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Georgia
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

Hawaii
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Idaho
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Illinois
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Indiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Iowa
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Kansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Kentucky
2025 State Scorecard Average

6%

Louisiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Maine
2025 State Scorecard Average

63%

Maryland
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Massachusetts
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Michigan
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Minnesota
2025 State Scorecard Average

94%

Mississippi
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Missouri
2025 State Scorecard Average

4%

Montana
2025 State Scorecard Average

6%

Nebraska
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Nevada
2025 State Scorecard Average

94%

New Hampshire
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

New Jersey
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

New Mexico
2025 State Scorecard Average

94%

New York
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

North Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

6%

North Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Oklahoma
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Oregon
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Pennsylvania
2025 State Scorecard Average

40%

Rhode Island
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

South Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

South Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Tennessee
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Texas
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Utah
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Vermont
2025 State Scorecard Average

96%

Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Washington
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

West Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Wisconsin
2025 State Scorecard Average

49%

Wyoming
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%