Environmental Funding Cuts

Senate Roll Call Vote 114

2005 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

No

Votes For

52

Votes Against

47

Not Voting

1

Issues

Robust funding for environment and natural resources stewardship is critical to keeping air and water clean, protecting public lands, and safeguarding fish and wildlife. Unfortunately, the fiscal year 2006 budgets proposed by the Bush Administration and endorsed by congressional leaders made substantial cuts to environmental programs.

The final budget resolution conference report, for instance, cut discretionary spending on environment and natural resource programs by $3.3 billion, more than 10 percent below the previous year’s levels. By 2010, funding levels for these programs would be 21 percent below the level needed to maintain current activities. Among the hardest hit are the Land and Water Conservation Fund, as well as programs to clean up water, protect oceans and coasts, and conserve agricultural lands. The resolution also allowed the Arctic Refuge to be opened up for drilling through a fast-track budget reconciliation bill.

On April 28, 2005, the Senate passed the budget resolution conference report by a 52-47 vote (Senate roll call vote 114). NO is the pro-environment vote.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2005 State Scorecard Average

0%

Alaska
2005 State Scorecard Average

0%

Arizona
2005 State Scorecard Average

56%

Arkansas
2005 State Scorecard Average

0%

California
2005 State Scorecard Average

99%

Colorado
2005 State Scorecard Average

100%

Connecticut
2005 State Scorecard Average

100%

Delaware
2005 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
2005 State Scorecard Average

0%

Georgia
2005 State Scorecard Average

94%

Hawaii
2005 State Scorecard Average

100%

Idaho
2005 State Scorecard Average

0%

Illinois
2005 State Scorecard Average

100%

Indiana
2005 State Scorecard Average

0%

Iowa
2005 State Scorecard Average

0%

Kansas
2005 State Scorecard Average

0%

Kentucky
2005 State Scorecard Average

6%

Louisiana
2005 State Scorecard Average

0%

Maine
2005 State Scorecard Average

50%

Maryland
2005 State Scorecard Average

100%

Massachusetts
2005 State Scorecard Average

100%

Michigan
2005 State Scorecard Average

100%

Minnesota
2005 State Scorecard Average

100%

Mississippi
2005 State Scorecard Average

0%

Missouri
2005 State Scorecard Average

0%

Montana
2005 State Scorecard Average

29%

Nebraska
2005 State Scorecard Average

0%

Nevada
2005 State Scorecard Average

100%

New Hampshire
2005 State Scorecard Average

100%

New Jersey
2005 State Scorecard Average

88%

New Mexico
2005 State Scorecard Average

100%

New York
2005 State Scorecard Average

100%

North Carolina
2005 State Scorecard Average

0%

North Dakota
2005 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2005 State Scorecard Average

25%

Oklahoma
2005 State Scorecard Average

0%

Oregon
2005 State Scorecard Average

100%

Pennsylvania
2005 State Scorecard Average

94%

Rhode Island
2005 State Scorecard Average

100%

South Carolina
2005 State Scorecard Average

0%

South Dakota
2005 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
2005 State Scorecard Average

0%

Texas
2005 State Scorecard Average

0%

Utah
2005 State Scorecard Average

2%

Vermont
2005 State Scorecard Average

94%

Virginia
2005 State Scorecard Average

100%

Washington
2005 State Scorecard Average

100%

West Virginia
2005 State Scorecard Average

6%

Wisconsin
2005 State Scorecard Average

50%

Wyoming
2005 State Scorecard Average

0%