Land and Water Conservation Fund

Senate Roll Call Vote 297

2009 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

Yes

Votes For

79

Votes Against

19

Not Voting

1

The Land and Water Conservation Fund is used by land management agencies to protect recreational access, natural resources and cultural heritage sites.

During consideration of the Interior-Environment appropriations bill, Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK) offered an amendment that would have taken funding for land acquisition under the Land and Water Conservation Fund and authorized it for operations, maintenance, and repair or rehabilitation projects for constructed assets. Had this amendment passed, the Land and Water Conservation Fund would effectively have been raided for the foreseeable future to give priority to construction projects. Construction was not the original intent of the 1965 law establishing this fund, which stated that offshore development royalties be used to acquire new lands – an asset for an asset. Because of the sheer number of operations and maintenance projects in the agency pipelines, the Land and Water Conservation Fund might not have received any land acquisition money at all and this important program would cease to exist as we currently know it.

On September 24, Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) offered a motion to table the Coburn amendment, which passed by a vote of 79-19 (Senate roll call vote 297). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2009 State Scorecard Average

0%

Alaska
2009 State Scorecard Average

0%

Arizona
2009 State Scorecard Average

56%

Arkansas
2009 State Scorecard Average

0%

California
2009 State Scorecard Average

99%

Colorado
2009 State Scorecard Average

100%

Connecticut
2009 State Scorecard Average

100%

Delaware
2009 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
2009 State Scorecard Average

0%

Georgia
2009 State Scorecard Average

94%

Hawaii
2009 State Scorecard Average

100%

Idaho
2009 State Scorecard Average

0%

Illinois
2009 State Scorecard Average

100%

Indiana
2009 State Scorecard Average

0%

Iowa
2009 State Scorecard Average

0%

Kansas
2009 State Scorecard Average

0%

Kentucky
2009 State Scorecard Average

6%

Louisiana
2009 State Scorecard Average

0%

Maine
2009 State Scorecard Average

50%

Maryland
2009 State Scorecard Average

100%

Massachusetts
2009 State Scorecard Average

100%

Michigan
2009 State Scorecard Average

100%

Minnesota
2009 State Scorecard Average

100%

Mississippi
2009 State Scorecard Average

0%

Missouri
2009 State Scorecard Average

0%

Montana
2009 State Scorecard Average

29%

Nebraska
2009 State Scorecard Average

0%

Nevada
2009 State Scorecard Average

100%

New Hampshire
2009 State Scorecard Average

100%

New Jersey
2009 State Scorecard Average

88%

New Mexico
2009 State Scorecard Average

100%

New York
2009 State Scorecard Average

100%

North Carolina
2009 State Scorecard Average

0%

North Dakota
2009 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2009 State Scorecard Average

25%

Oklahoma
2009 State Scorecard Average

0%

Oregon
2009 State Scorecard Average

100%

Pennsylvania
2009 State Scorecard Average

94%

Rhode Island
2009 State Scorecard Average

100%

South Carolina
2009 State Scorecard Average

0%

South Dakota
2009 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
2009 State Scorecard Average

0%

Texas
2009 State Scorecard Average

0%

Utah
2009 State Scorecard Average

2%

Vermont
2009 State Scorecard Average

94%

Virginia
2009 State Scorecard Average

100%

Washington
2009 State Scorecard Average

100%

West Virginia
2009 State Scorecard Average

6%

Wisconsin
2009 State Scorecard Average

50%

Wyoming
2009 State Scorecard Average

0%