Oil Royalties

Senate Roll Call Vote 290

1999 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

No

Votes For

51

Votes Against

47

Not Voting

2

Companies that drill for oil and gas on public lands pay for the privilege in the form of royalties. Although oil companies are supposed to pay a royalty based on a percentage of gross proceeds, the industry has instead used a “posted price” which can differ by as much as $2 per barrel from the actual daily market price of oil. According to the Department of Interior, oil companies underpay royalties by more than $66 million per year. This has the additional effect of shortchanging the Land and Water Conservation Fund, which allocates a portion of oil royalty revenue to the purchase of important natural places and habitat. 

For the past three years, the Interior Department has sought to institute reforms that would create a fair, market-based payment process for oil royalties and make it easier for the government to catch discrepancies in royalty payments. However, members of Congress from oil-producing states have used an array of riders and other legislative tools to prevent the Interior Department from implementing these reforms. 

During consideration of the Fiscal Year 2000 Interior Appropriations bill, Senators Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX) and Pete Domenici (R-NM) offered an amendment that would impose a moratorium on implementing new rules for oil valuation. Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) attempted to block the amendment through a filibuster. 

Senate debate on an issue can continue indefinitely without a final vote on passage unless 60 senators vote to invoke “cloture,” thereby cutting off debate. Senator Boxer’s filibuster lasted for two weeks before proponents of the Hutchison amendment could muster enough senators to cut off debate and allow a vote on the amendment to delay the oil royalty reforms. Had the filibuster continued, the amendment likely would have been withdrawn, and the reforms would have gone into effect. 

On September 23, 1999, the Senate voted, 60–39, to end the filibuster by invoking cloture. NO is the pro-environment vote. The Senate then adopted the Hutchison amendment by a 51–47 vote. NO is the pro-environment vote. 

The final omnibus appropriations bill included a modified oil royalty reform provision, delaying implementation of the new royalty formula until March 15, 2000.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
1999 State Scorecard Average

0%

Alaska
1999 State Scorecard Average

0%

Arizona
1999 State Scorecard Average

56%

Arkansas
1999 State Scorecard Average

0%

California
1999 State Scorecard Average

99%

Colorado
1999 State Scorecard Average

100%

Connecticut
1999 State Scorecard Average

100%

Delaware
1999 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
1999 State Scorecard Average

0%

Georgia
1999 State Scorecard Average

94%

Hawaii
1999 State Scorecard Average

100%

Idaho
1999 State Scorecard Average

0%

Illinois
1999 State Scorecard Average

100%

Indiana
1999 State Scorecard Average

0%

Iowa
1999 State Scorecard Average

0%

Kansas
1999 State Scorecard Average

0%

Kentucky
1999 State Scorecard Average

6%

Louisiana
1999 State Scorecard Average

0%

Maine
1999 State Scorecard Average

50%

Maryland
1999 State Scorecard Average

100%

Massachusetts
1999 State Scorecard Average

100%

Michigan
1999 State Scorecard Average

100%

Minnesota
1999 State Scorecard Average

100%

Mississippi
1999 State Scorecard Average

0%

Missouri
1999 State Scorecard Average

0%

Montana
1999 State Scorecard Average

29%

Nebraska
1999 State Scorecard Average

0%

Nevada
1999 State Scorecard Average

100%

New Hampshire
1999 State Scorecard Average

100%

New Jersey
1999 State Scorecard Average

88%

New Mexico
1999 State Scorecard Average

100%

New York
1999 State Scorecard Average

100%

North Carolina
1999 State Scorecard Average

0%

North Dakota
1999 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
1999 State Scorecard Average

25%

Oklahoma
1999 State Scorecard Average

0%

Oregon
1999 State Scorecard Average

100%

Pennsylvania
1999 State Scorecard Average

94%

Rhode Island
1999 State Scorecard Average

100%

South Carolina
1999 State Scorecard Average

0%

South Dakota
1999 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
1999 State Scorecard Average

0%

Texas
1999 State Scorecard Average

0%

Utah
1999 State Scorecard Average

2%

Vermont
1999 State Scorecard Average

94%

Virginia
1999 State Scorecard Average

100%

Washington
1999 State Scorecard Average

100%

West Virginia
1999 State Scorecard Average

6%

Wisconsin
1999 State Scorecard Average

50%

Wyoming
1999 State Scorecard Average

0%