Wildlife Surveys

Senate Roll Call Vote 266

1999 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

Yes

Votes For

45

Votes Against

52

Not Voting

3

The Fiscal Year 2000 Interior appropriations bill contained dozens of anti-environment riders that threatened America’s public lands and wildlife. One of the most potentially damaging riders would have affected the way the departments of Interior and Agriculture amend resource management plans, issue leases, or carry out other management activities in national forests or on Bureau of Land Management lands. The rider would have allowed agency officials making these decisions to avoid collecting or considering any new scientific data on wildlife. This would have undermined the agency’s own regulations, which require the collection of population data for certain rare or important species. 

The rider was designed to overturn a February 1999 decision by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals that the Forest Service had violated National Forest Management Act regulations and the Chattahoochee Forest Management Plan by not compiling adequate scientific data on wildlife populations in its management of the Chattahoochee National Forest in Georgia. However, the rider also had broad implications for wildlife and public lands nationwide, threatening the implementation of the Northwest Forest Plan and new scientific recommendations for management planning in national forests. 

Senator Chuck Robb (D-VA) introduced an amendment to remove the rider. On September 9, 1999, the Senate rejected the amendment 45–52. YES is the pro-environment vote.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
1999 State Scorecard Average

0%

Alaska
1999 State Scorecard Average

0%

Arizona
1999 State Scorecard Average

56%

Arkansas
1999 State Scorecard Average

0%

California
1999 State Scorecard Average

99%

Colorado
1999 State Scorecard Average

100%

Connecticut
1999 State Scorecard Average

100%

Delaware
1999 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
1999 State Scorecard Average

0%

Georgia
1999 State Scorecard Average

94%

Hawaii
1999 State Scorecard Average

100%

Idaho
1999 State Scorecard Average

0%

Illinois
1999 State Scorecard Average

100%

Indiana
1999 State Scorecard Average

0%

Iowa
1999 State Scorecard Average

0%

Kansas
1999 State Scorecard Average

0%

Kentucky
1999 State Scorecard Average

6%

Louisiana
1999 State Scorecard Average

0%

Maine
1999 State Scorecard Average

50%

Maryland
1999 State Scorecard Average

100%

Massachusetts
1999 State Scorecard Average

100%

Michigan
1999 State Scorecard Average

100%

Minnesota
1999 State Scorecard Average

100%

Mississippi
1999 State Scorecard Average

0%

Missouri
1999 State Scorecard Average

0%

Montana
1999 State Scorecard Average

29%

Nebraska
1999 State Scorecard Average

0%

Nevada
1999 State Scorecard Average

100%

New Hampshire
1999 State Scorecard Average

100%

New Jersey
1999 State Scorecard Average

88%

New Mexico
1999 State Scorecard Average

100%

New York
1999 State Scorecard Average

100%

North Carolina
1999 State Scorecard Average

0%

North Dakota
1999 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
1999 State Scorecard Average

25%

Oklahoma
1999 State Scorecard Average

0%

Oregon
1999 State Scorecard Average

100%

Pennsylvania
1999 State Scorecard Average

94%

Rhode Island
1999 State Scorecard Average

100%

South Carolina
1999 State Scorecard Average

0%

South Dakota
1999 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
1999 State Scorecard Average

0%

Texas
1999 State Scorecard Average

0%

Utah
1999 State Scorecard Average

2%

Vermont
1999 State Scorecard Average

94%

Virginia
1999 State Scorecard Average

100%

Washington
1999 State Scorecard Average

100%

West Virginia
1999 State Scorecard Average

6%

Wisconsin
1999 State Scorecard Average

50%

Wyoming
1999 State Scorecard Average

0%