Nuclear Accident Liability

Senate Roll Call Vote 42

2002 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

No

Votes For

78

Votes Against

21

Not Voting

1

Enacted in 1957 as a short term measure to spur nuclear power plant development, the Price-Anderson Act continues to give nuclear plant operators an unfair subsidy by limiting their liability to the public in the event of a nuclear accident. The act caps liability at $9.4 billion and provides no mechanism for paying damages above that amount. A worst-case accident at a U.S. nuclear plant could result in damages of more than $500 billion, according to a government-commissioned study by the Sandia National Laboratory. However, Price-Anderson’s liability limitation would leave victims of a nuclear accident with no guarantee of complete compensation. Moreover, the act fully indemnifies Energy Department contractors, which means that taxpayers would bear the full cost of accidents that take place at contractors’ facilities, at third-party facilities where contractors are working, and on the road when contractors are hauling nuclear materials or waste.

By mitigating investment risk and dramatically reducing the cost of liability insurance, the Price-Anderson Act is a major taxpayer subsidy of the nuclear industry, with an annual value estimated at anywhere from $366 million to $3.4 billion. This subsidy distorts power prices and gives the nuclear power industry an artificial advantage over other power sources.

The Price-Anderson Act expired on August 1, 2002, although some provisions remained in force for pre-existing nuclear facilities. On March 7, 2002, during consideration of the Senate energy bill (S. 517), Senator George Voinovich (R-OH) offered an amendment to reauthorize the act. Conservationists opposed reauthorization, on the grounds that it is a subsidy for a new generation of nuclear power plants and an incentive to produce more nuclear waste.

On March 7, 2002, the Senate passed the Voinovich amendment by a 78-21 vote (Senate roll call vote 42). NO is the pro-environment vote. The House likewise reauthorized Price-Anderson in a separate unanimous consent motion, passed in 2001. At press time the House and Senate conference on the energy package had not produced a final bill.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Alaska
2025 State Scorecard Average

11%

Arizona
2025 State Scorecard Average

89%

Arkansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

California
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Colorado
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

Connecticut
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Delaware
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Florida
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Georgia
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

Hawaii
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Idaho
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Illinois
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Indiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Iowa
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Kansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Kentucky
2025 State Scorecard Average

6%

Louisiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Maine
2025 State Scorecard Average

63%

Maryland
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Massachusetts
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Michigan
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Minnesota
2025 State Scorecard Average

94%

Mississippi
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Missouri
2025 State Scorecard Average

4%

Montana
2025 State Scorecard Average

6%

Nebraska
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Nevada
2025 State Scorecard Average

94%

New Hampshire
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

New Jersey
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

New Mexico
2025 State Scorecard Average

94%

New York
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

North Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

6%

North Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Oklahoma
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Oregon
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Pennsylvania
2025 State Scorecard Average

40%

Rhode Island
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

South Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

South Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Tennessee
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Texas
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Utah
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Vermont
2025 State Scorecard Average

96%

Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Washington
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

West Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Wisconsin
2025 State Scorecard Average

49%

Wyoming
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%