Crippling the EPA

Senate Roll Call Vote 470

1995 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

No

Votes For

55

Votes Against

45

The Fiscal 1996 Veterans Administration – Housing & Urban Development (VA-HUD) — Independent Agencies Appropriations Bill, H.R. 2099, which funds the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), slashed $1.5 billion from the Agency’s $7 billion budget, a larger cut than that of other major agencies funded by the bill. In addition, the bill included numerous legislative restrictions, known as “riders,” which would hamper EPA’s ability to carry out environmental protection. The riders ranged from narrow exemptions for water treatment facilities to broad rollbacks of clean air and water regulation. Among the riders were provisions eliminating EPA’s role in protecting wetlands, prohibiting EPA from regulating arsenic in drinking water, and blocking enforcement of clean air regulations.

H.R. 2099 also cut funding in half for the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ). CEQ oversees the government’s compliance with environmental laws, particularly the National Environmental Policy Act.

When H.R. 2099 reached the floor of the Senate, several amendments were offered to improve the bill, but all were rejected. On September 27, 1995, the Senate approved the bill 55 – 45. NO is the pro-environment vote.

President Clinton vetoed H.R. 2099 on December 18, 1995.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Alaska
2025 State Scorecard Average

11%

Arizona
2025 State Scorecard Average

89%

Arkansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

California
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Colorado
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

Connecticut
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Delaware
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Florida
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Georgia
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

Hawaii
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Idaho
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Illinois
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Indiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Iowa
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Kansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Kentucky
2025 State Scorecard Average

6%

Louisiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Maine
2025 State Scorecard Average

63%

Maryland
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Massachusetts
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Michigan
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Minnesota
2025 State Scorecard Average

94%

Mississippi
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Missouri
2025 State Scorecard Average

4%

Montana
2025 State Scorecard Average

6%

Nebraska
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Nevada
2025 State Scorecard Average

94%

New Hampshire
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

New Jersey
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

New Mexico
2025 State Scorecard Average

94%

New York
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

North Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

6%

North Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Oklahoma
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Oregon
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Pennsylvania
2025 State Scorecard Average

40%

Rhode Island
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

South Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

South Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Tennessee
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Texas
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Utah
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Vermont
2025 State Scorecard Average

96%

Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Washington
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

West Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Wisconsin
2025 State Scorecard Average

49%

Wyoming
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%