Energy Efficiency

Senate Roll Call Vote 89

2002 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

No

Votes For

52

Votes Against

47

Not Voting

1

Air conditioning represents a major share of peak power demand in urban areas on hot days–as much as 70 percent in Houston for example. Improving the efficiency of air conditioning can bring enormous benefits to the environment by reducing power plant emissions that cause acid rain, mercury contamination, and climate change. Greater efficiency can significantly reduce power shortages in highly populated areas, potentially making the difference between a stable power supply and an ongoing series of blackouts and brownouts.

In the closing days of the Clinton administration, the Energy Department issued a new regulation that required a 30 percent increase in the minimum energy efficiency standard for central air conditioners and heat pumps–a level already available in current models from every major manufacturer. By the time President Bush entered office, this regulation had already been finalized, but it nevertheless was one of the rules scrutinized by the new administration for its impact on industry. Soon thereafter, the Department of Energy abandoned the rule, and proposed a new rule that would raise the efficiency standard by only 20 percent.

Conservationists maintain that this lower standard would require the construction of 45 more power plants over the next 20 years, consume another 14,500 megawatts of electricity, cost consumers an additional $1 billion on their electric bills and send an extra 2.5 million metric tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Senator Jeff Bingaman (D-NM) opposed the lower standard and mandated a 30 percent increase in air conditioner efficiency in the Senate energy bill (S. 517).

However, during Senate floor consideration of the bill, Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA) introduced an amendment that, in effect, struck the 30 percent increase from the bill. On April 25, 2002, the Senate approved the Harkin amendment by a 52-47 vote (Senate roll call vote 89). NO is the pro-environment vote. At press time the House and Senate conference on the energy package had not produced a final bill.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Alaska
2025 State Scorecard Average

11%

Arizona
2025 State Scorecard Average

89%

Arkansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

California
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Colorado
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

Connecticut
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Delaware
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Florida
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Georgia
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

Hawaii
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Idaho
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Illinois
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Indiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Iowa
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Kansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Kentucky
2025 State Scorecard Average

6%

Louisiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Maine
2025 State Scorecard Average

63%

Maryland
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Massachusetts
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Michigan
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Minnesota
2025 State Scorecard Average

94%

Mississippi
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Missouri
2025 State Scorecard Average

4%

Montana
2025 State Scorecard Average

6%

Nebraska
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Nevada
2025 State Scorecard Average

94%

New Hampshire
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

New Jersey
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

New Mexico
2025 State Scorecard Average

94%

New York
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

North Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

6%

North Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Oklahoma
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Oregon
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Pennsylvania
2025 State Scorecard Average

40%

Rhode Island
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

South Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

South Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Tennessee
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Texas
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Utah
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Vermont
2025 State Scorecard Average

96%

Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Washington
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

West Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Wisconsin
2025 State Scorecard Average

49%

Wyoming
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%