Logging Roads Subsidies

Senate Roll Call Vote 242

1997 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

Yes

Votes For

49

Votes Against

51

Nearly 380,000 miles of roads criss-cross the National Forests–eight times the length of the Interstate Highway system, and enough to circle the globe 15 times. In most western states the density of roads on Forest Service lands is greater than the density of roads on all other lands. Approximately 70% of those roads were built as logging roads. Logging roads have many adverse effects. In addition to destroying the wild character of the forests, logging roads destroy and fragment wildlife habitat, cause erosion and mudslides, and generate sediment in streams that damages fish habitat. Sediment loading in streams also threatens the drinking water of hundreds of communities. Despite the damage done to public resources by logging roads, the Forest Service subsidizes timber companies’ road construction costs.

During consideration of H.R. 2107, the Fiscal Year 1998 Department of the Interior appropriations (budget) bill, Senator Richard Bryan (D-NV) offered an amendment to cut by $10 million the Forest Service’s $47 million account that funds new logging road construction, and to eliminate an indirect subsidy, the Purchaser Road Credits program. Under that program, timber companies receive credits for construction of new logging roads to offset what they owe the government for sales of timber from Forest Service lands. In essence, the program gives trees to timber companies in payment for road construction costs. The Forest Service spent $40 million last year on the Purchaser Road Credits program.

The initial vote on the Bryan amendment was a tie, which would have killed the amendment. Prior to the vote ending, Senator Bryan switched his vote from “yes” to “no” to allow him to use a procedural technique to ask for a re-vote. On the second vote, Senator Sam Brownback (R-KS) changed his vote from “yes” to “no” and, on September 17, 1997, the Bryan amendment was defeated 49 – 51. YES is the pro-environment vote. (See House vote 2).

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Alaska
2025 State Scorecard Average

11%

Arizona
2025 State Scorecard Average

89%

Arkansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

California
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Colorado
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

Connecticut
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Delaware
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Florida
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Georgia
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

Hawaii
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Idaho
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Illinois
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Indiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Iowa
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Kansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Kentucky
2025 State Scorecard Average

6%

Louisiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Maine
2025 State Scorecard Average

63%

Maryland
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Massachusetts
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Michigan
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Minnesota
2025 State Scorecard Average

94%

Mississippi
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Missouri
2025 State Scorecard Average

4%

Montana
2025 State Scorecard Average

6%

Nebraska
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Nevada
2025 State Scorecard Average

94%

New Hampshire
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

New Jersey
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

New Mexico
2025 State Scorecard Average

94%

New York
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

North Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

6%

North Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Oklahoma
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Oregon
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Pennsylvania
2025 State Scorecard Average

40%

Rhode Island
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

South Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

South Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Tennessee
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Texas
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Utah
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Vermont
2025 State Scorecard Average

96%

Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Washington
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

West Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Wisconsin
2025 State Scorecard Average

49%

Wyoming
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%