Nuclear Reactor

Senate Roll Call Vote 347

1995 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

Yes

Votes For

62

Votes Against

38

Despite massive government subsidies, the U.S. nuclear power industry has failed to solve its serious economic, safety, and waste disposal problems and, as a result, no successful order for a new commercial nuclear reactor has been placed in over 20 years. Federal subsidies for nuclear power continue, however. Since 1978, for example, the Department of Energy has spent over $900 million to develop a Gas Turbine-Modular Helium Reactor (GT-MHR).

Like many past federally funded nuclear power projects, the GT-MHR is economically unjustifiable and, according to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, suffers from serious safety flaws. In 1992, the National Academy of Sciences recommended that Congress allocate no funds for the technology.

The Fiscal 1996 Energy and Water Appropriations Bill, H.R. 1905, contained a provision funding the GT-MHR at $12 million. On August 1, 1995, Senator Dale Bumpers (D-AR) offered an amendment to terminate the project by cutting the appropriation to $7 million to be used only for shutdown costs. The Bumpers amendment passed 62 – 38. YES is the pro-environment vote.

President Clinton signed H.R. 1905 into law on November 13, 1995.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
1995 State Scorecard Average

0%

Alaska
1995 State Scorecard Average

0%

Arizona
1995 State Scorecard Average

56%

Arkansas
1995 State Scorecard Average

0%

California
1995 State Scorecard Average

99%

Colorado
1995 State Scorecard Average

100%

Connecticut
1995 State Scorecard Average

100%

Delaware
1995 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
1995 State Scorecard Average

0%

Georgia
1995 State Scorecard Average

94%

Hawaii
1995 State Scorecard Average

100%

Idaho
1995 State Scorecard Average

0%

Illinois
1995 State Scorecard Average

100%

Indiana
1995 State Scorecard Average

0%

Iowa
1995 State Scorecard Average

0%

Kansas
1995 State Scorecard Average

0%

Kentucky
1995 State Scorecard Average

6%

Louisiana
1995 State Scorecard Average

0%

Maine
1995 State Scorecard Average

50%

Maryland
1995 State Scorecard Average

100%

Massachusetts
1995 State Scorecard Average

100%

Michigan
1995 State Scorecard Average

100%

Minnesota
1995 State Scorecard Average

100%

Mississippi
1995 State Scorecard Average

0%

Missouri
1995 State Scorecard Average

0%

Montana
1995 State Scorecard Average

29%

Nebraska
1995 State Scorecard Average

0%

Nevada
1995 State Scorecard Average

100%

New Hampshire
1995 State Scorecard Average

100%

New Jersey
1995 State Scorecard Average

88%

New Mexico
1995 State Scorecard Average

100%

New York
1995 State Scorecard Average

100%

North Carolina
1995 State Scorecard Average

0%

North Dakota
1995 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
1995 State Scorecard Average

25%

Oklahoma
1995 State Scorecard Average

0%

Oregon
1995 State Scorecard Average

100%

Pennsylvania
1995 State Scorecard Average

94%

Rhode Island
1995 State Scorecard Average

100%

South Carolina
1995 State Scorecard Average

0%

South Dakota
1995 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
1995 State Scorecard Average

0%

Texas
1995 State Scorecard Average

0%

Utah
1995 State Scorecard Average

2%

Vermont
1995 State Scorecard Average

94%

Virginia
1995 State Scorecard Average

100%

Washington
1995 State Scorecard Average

100%

West Virginia
1995 State Scorecard Average

6%

Wisconsin
1995 State Scorecard Average

50%

Wyoming
1995 State Scorecard Average

0%