Sugar Subsidy

Senate Roll Call Vote 16

1996 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

Yes

Votes For

35

Votes Against

61

Not Voting

4

Issues

Large sugar cane growing operations south of Lake Okeechobee disrupt natural water flow through the Florida Everglades ecosystem and pollute the water with heavy applications of fertilizer and pesticides. The Department of Agriculture’s sugar program subsidizes this destruction by artificially inflating sugar prices and imposing quotas on imported sugar.

During debate on the Senate version of the 1996 Farm Bill, S. 1541, Sen. Judd Gregg (R-NH) offered an amendment to end the sugar price-support program. On February 7, 1996, the Senate rejected the Gregg amendment, 35 – 61. YES is the pro-environment vote. (See House vote 8.)

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
1996 State Scorecard Average

0%

Alaska
1996 State Scorecard Average

0%

Arizona
1996 State Scorecard Average

56%

Arkansas
1996 State Scorecard Average

0%

California
1996 State Scorecard Average

99%

Colorado
1996 State Scorecard Average

100%

Connecticut
1996 State Scorecard Average

100%

Delaware
1996 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
1996 State Scorecard Average

0%

Georgia
1996 State Scorecard Average

94%

Hawaii
1996 State Scorecard Average

100%

Idaho
1996 State Scorecard Average

0%

Illinois
1996 State Scorecard Average

100%

Indiana
1996 State Scorecard Average

0%

Iowa
1996 State Scorecard Average

0%

Kansas
1996 State Scorecard Average

0%

Kentucky
1996 State Scorecard Average

6%

Louisiana
1996 State Scorecard Average

0%

Maine
1996 State Scorecard Average

50%

Maryland
1996 State Scorecard Average

100%

Massachusetts
1996 State Scorecard Average

100%

Michigan
1996 State Scorecard Average

100%

Minnesota
1996 State Scorecard Average

100%

Mississippi
1996 State Scorecard Average

0%

Missouri
1996 State Scorecard Average

0%

Montana
1996 State Scorecard Average

29%

Nebraska
1996 State Scorecard Average

0%

Nevada
1996 State Scorecard Average

100%

New Hampshire
1996 State Scorecard Average

100%

New Jersey
1996 State Scorecard Average

88%

New Mexico
1996 State Scorecard Average

100%

New York
1996 State Scorecard Average

100%

North Carolina
1996 State Scorecard Average

0%

North Dakota
1996 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
1996 State Scorecard Average

25%

Oklahoma
1996 State Scorecard Average

0%

Oregon
1996 State Scorecard Average

100%

Pennsylvania
1996 State Scorecard Average

94%

Rhode Island
1996 State Scorecard Average

100%

South Carolina
1996 State Scorecard Average

0%

South Dakota
1996 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
1996 State Scorecard Average

0%

Texas
1996 State Scorecard Average

0%

Utah
1996 State Scorecard Average

2%

Vermont
1996 State Scorecard Average

94%

Virginia
1996 State Scorecard Average

100%

Washington
1996 State Scorecard Average

100%

West Virginia
1996 State Scorecard Average

6%

Wisconsin
1996 State Scorecard Average

50%

Wyoming
1996 State Scorecard Average

0%