Nevada Nuclear Waste Dump

Senate Roll Call Vote 148

1998 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

No

Votes For

56

Votes Against

39

Not Voting

5

In 1987, Congress voted to create a permanent repository for “high-level nuclear waste” (irradiated fuel) from nuclear power plants, to be located at Yucca Mountain, about 100 miles from Las Vegas, Nevada. For the past 10 years, the Department of Energy has been assessing whether Yucca Mountain is a suitable permanent waste site and is expected to make a final decision in 2001. The site comes with serious unresolved technical problems. An estimated 33 earthquake faults lie in Yucca Mountain’s vicinity. It is widely accepted that the area’s groundwater will be contaminated, with waste possibly migrating to the surface in less than 1,000 years. In the meantime, with on-site storage areas at nuclear power plants reaching full capacity, the nuclear power industry is arguing for a federal interim storage facility until a permanent repository is completed. 

S. 104, the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1997, sponsored by Energy and Natural Resources Committee Chairman Frank Murkowski (R-AK), would establish an above-ground “interim” nuclear waste dump near the proposed permanent repository at Yucca Mountain. The facility, to be opened in 2003, would accept a total of 40,000 metric tons of irradiated fuel that would be transported through 43 states. S. 104 would also severely weaken environmental standards for nuclear waste disposal, weaken allowable radiation exposure standards at the site, and put dangerous radioactive waste on the nation’s roads and rails without adequate safety standards. The establishment of a centralized “interim” nuclear waste storage site is likely to bias the decision to site the permanent repository in Nevada, regardless of the scientific findings about Yucca Mountain.

On April 15, 1997, the Senate passed S. 104, 65 – 34 (1997 LCV Scorecard, Senate vote 6). The House passed a similar bill, H.R. 1270, 307 – 120 (1997 LCV Scorecard, House vote 13). Ordinarily, a House-Senate conference committee would resolve differences between the bills and the resulting conference report would be taken up by both Houses for passage. However, bill supporters were concerned that there were too many procedural opportunities to delay votes on the Senate floor on a conference report. These supporters then tried to bring the House bill to the Senate floor. Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott (R-MS) interrupted deliberations on the tobacco bill to take up H.R. 1270. He also filed a cloture petition to cut off the likely filibuster. (Senate debate on an issue can continue indefinitely without a final vote on passage unless 60 senators vote to invoke “cloture” to cut off debate.) On June 2, 1998, the cloture petition failed, 56 – 39, and the bill was killed for the 105th Congress. NO is the pro-environment vote.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Alaska
2025 State Scorecard Average

11%

Arizona
2025 State Scorecard Average

89%

Arkansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

California
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Colorado
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

Connecticut
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Delaware
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Florida
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Georgia
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

Hawaii
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Idaho
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Illinois
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Indiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Iowa
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Kansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Kentucky
2025 State Scorecard Average

6%

Louisiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Maine
2025 State Scorecard Average

63%

Maryland
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Massachusetts
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Michigan
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Minnesota
2025 State Scorecard Average

94%

Mississippi
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Missouri
2025 State Scorecard Average

4%

Montana
2025 State Scorecard Average

6%

Nebraska
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Nevada
2025 State Scorecard Average

94%

New Hampshire
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

New Jersey
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

New Mexico
2025 State Scorecard Average

94%

New York
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

North Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

6%

North Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Oklahoma
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Oregon
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Pennsylvania
2025 State Scorecard Average

40%

Rhode Island
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

South Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

South Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Tennessee
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Texas
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Utah
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Vermont
2025 State Scorecard Average

96%

Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Washington
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

West Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Wisconsin
2025 State Scorecard Average

49%

Wyoming
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%