Mining Royalties

Senate Roll Call Vote 81

1993 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

Yes

Votes For

61

Votes Against

38

Not Voting

1

The House and Senate are on the verge of overhauling the 1872 Mining Law, an anachronism that provides few environmental standards or requirements for repairing lands damaged by a century of hard rock mining. Today, private mining companies pay virtually nothing to obtain publicly owned minerals. Seeking to strengthen the outdated law, the House in late 1993 passed H.R. 322 (see House vote No. 3), supported by both the administration and environmentalists. The Senate-passed version, S. 775, is backed by the mining industry and some Western senators. A conference committee will try to strike a compromise in early 1994.

In its initial fiscal 1994 budget proposal to Congress, the Clinton administration had made its own effort to receive fair value for the public’s minerals, reduce the deficit, and move toward mining reform: the original Clinton budget proposed a 12.5% royalty for hard rock mining on public lands. But Western senators strongly objected and pressured the White House to drop the royalty. Accordingly, Sen. Larry Craig (R-ID) tried to amend the budget with S. Res. 18, which would have reduced the amount the Energy and Natural Resources Committee was instructed to raise in fiscal 1994. As Chair of the Budget Committee, Sen. Jim Sasser (D-TN) saw this move as an attempt to undercut the Senate’s obligation to reduce the budget deficit, and therefore opposed the amendment.

Sen. Sasser moved to table (kill) S. Res. 18. The motion was agreed to 61-38. YES is the pro-environmental vote.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Alaska
2025 State Scorecard Average

11%

Arizona
2025 State Scorecard Average

89%

Arkansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

California
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Colorado
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

Connecticut
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Delaware
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Florida
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Georgia
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

Hawaii
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Idaho
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Illinois
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Indiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Iowa
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Kansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Kentucky
2025 State Scorecard Average

6%

Louisiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Maine
2025 State Scorecard Average

63%

Maryland
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Massachusetts
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Michigan
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Minnesota
2025 State Scorecard Average

94%

Mississippi
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Missouri
2025 State Scorecard Average

4%

Montana
2025 State Scorecard Average

6%

Nebraska
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Nevada
2025 State Scorecard Average

94%

New Hampshire
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

New Jersey
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

New Mexico
2025 State Scorecard Average

94%

New York
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

North Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

6%

North Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Oklahoma
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Oregon
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Pennsylvania
2025 State Scorecard Average

40%

Rhode Island
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

South Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

South Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Tennessee
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Texas
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Utah
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Vermont
2025 State Scorecard Average

96%

Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Washington
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

West Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Wisconsin
2025 State Scorecard Average

49%

Wyoming
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%