Protecting Farmworkers from Pesticides

Senate Roll Call Vote 50

1994 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

Yes

Votes For

35

Votes Against

65

In 1984, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) concluded that existing regulations failed to protect the nation’s two million farm-workers from exposure to dangerous pesticides. Each year researchers found more than 300,000 farm-workers became ill — and some died — due to pesticide exposure.

To address this problem, EPA developed new health and safety standards that would require employers to provide their farm-workers with, among other things, basic pesticide safety training and emergency assistance. After a decade of delays, the new rules were scheduled to go into effect on April 21, 1994. Finally, farm-workers — many of whom are people of color living in poverty — would be protected by at least minimum health and safety standards.

Despite ample warning that the new rules were coming — and extensive opportunities to comment on their content — agribusiness interests claimed that they would not be ready to comply and sought further delay. On March 9, 1994, Sen. Thad Cochran (R-MS) went to the Senate floor to offer an amendment to delay implementation of the farmworker protection standards for 18 months. The amendment was offered to an unrelated bill.

In response, Sen. Ernest F. Hollings (D-SC) offered a motion to table (kill) the Cochran amendment. The Senate rejected Hollings` motion by a vote of 35 – 65. Following this vote the Senate passed a compromise that delayed most of the new regulations for nine months, rather than 18.

YES on the Hollings motion to table the Cochran amendment is the pro-environment vote.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Alaska
2025 State Scorecard Average

11%

Arizona
2025 State Scorecard Average

89%

Arkansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

California
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Colorado
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

Connecticut
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Delaware
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Florida
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Georgia
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

Hawaii
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Idaho
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Illinois
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Indiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Iowa
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Kansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Kentucky
2025 State Scorecard Average

6%

Louisiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Maine
2025 State Scorecard Average

63%

Maryland
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Massachusetts
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Michigan
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Minnesota
2025 State Scorecard Average

94%

Mississippi
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Missouri
2025 State Scorecard Average

4%

Montana
2025 State Scorecard Average

6%

Nebraska
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Nevada
2025 State Scorecard Average

94%

New Hampshire
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

New Jersey
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

New Mexico
2025 State Scorecard Average

94%

New York
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

North Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

6%

North Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Oklahoma
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Oregon
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Pennsylvania
2025 State Scorecard Average

40%

Rhode Island
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

South Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

South Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Tennessee
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Texas
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Utah
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Vermont
2025 State Scorecard Average

96%

Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Washington
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

West Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Wisconsin
2025 State Scorecard Average

49%

Wyoming
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%