Undermining Critical Habitat for Wildlife

Senate Roll Call Vote 128

2015 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

No

Votes For

52

Votes Against

42

Not Voting

6

Issues

Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR) offered an amendment to S. Con. Res. 11, the Senate version of the FY16 budget, which would undermine the protection of imperiled plants and wildlife. The Cotton amendment would require the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) to examine the “cumulative” economic effects of a critical habitat designation, such as the effect on agriculture and business. The FWS already evaluates the total federal costs of a critical habitat designation and this amendment would drain agency resources that could be better used to further protections for wildlife and plants. On March 27, the Senate approved the Cotton amendment by a vote of 52-42 (Senate roll call vote 128). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Cotton amendment was included in the final Budget Conference Report that was approved by the House on April 30 and the Senate on May 5.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2015 State Scorecard Average

0%

Alaska
2015 State Scorecard Average

0%

Arizona
2015 State Scorecard Average

56%

Arkansas
2015 State Scorecard Average

0%

California
2015 State Scorecard Average

99%

Colorado
2015 State Scorecard Average

100%

Connecticut
2015 State Scorecard Average

100%

Delaware
2015 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
2015 State Scorecard Average

0%

Georgia
2015 State Scorecard Average

94%

Hawaii
2015 State Scorecard Average

100%

Idaho
2015 State Scorecard Average

0%

Illinois
2015 State Scorecard Average

100%

Indiana
2015 State Scorecard Average

0%

Iowa
2015 State Scorecard Average

0%

Kansas
2015 State Scorecard Average

0%

Kentucky
2015 State Scorecard Average

6%

Louisiana
2015 State Scorecard Average

0%

Maine
2015 State Scorecard Average

50%

Maryland
2015 State Scorecard Average

100%

Massachusetts
2015 State Scorecard Average

100%

Michigan
2015 State Scorecard Average

100%

Minnesota
2015 State Scorecard Average

100%

Mississippi
2015 State Scorecard Average

0%

Missouri
2015 State Scorecard Average

0%

Montana
2015 State Scorecard Average

29%

Nebraska
2015 State Scorecard Average

0%

Nevada
2015 State Scorecard Average

100%

New Hampshire
2015 State Scorecard Average

100%

New Jersey
2015 State Scorecard Average

88%

New Mexico
2015 State Scorecard Average

100%

New York
2015 State Scorecard Average

100%

North Carolina
2015 State Scorecard Average

0%

North Dakota
2015 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2015 State Scorecard Average

25%

Oklahoma
2015 State Scorecard Average

0%

Oregon
2015 State Scorecard Average

100%

Pennsylvania
2015 State Scorecard Average

94%

Rhode Island
2015 State Scorecard Average

100%

South Carolina
2015 State Scorecard Average

0%

South Dakota
2015 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
2015 State Scorecard Average

0%

Texas
2015 State Scorecard Average

0%

Utah
2015 State Scorecard Average

2%

Vermont
2015 State Scorecard Average

94%

Virginia
2015 State Scorecard Average

100%

Washington
2015 State Scorecard Average

100%

West Virginia
2015 State Scorecard Average

6%

Wisconsin
2015 State Scorecard Average

50%

Wyoming
2015 State Scorecard Average

0%