Temporary “Away From Reactor” Storage of Nuclear Wastes

Senate Roll Call Vote 586

1982 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

No

Votes For

46

Votes Against

43

Not Voting

11

The vote is on the Johnston (D-LA) motion to kill the Thurmond (R-SC) – Hollings (D-SC) amendment to the National Nuclear Waste Policy Act. The Thurmond amendment, supported by environmentalists, would have stopped the government from providing temporary storage for nuclear wastes from private power plants. Government “away from reactor” storage represents a major bailout of the nuclear industry, and a top priority for industry lobbyists in 1982. Although the industry would pay storage costs, the federal government would assume the risks and financial liability involved in transporting and storing up to 7,000 truckloads of deadly nuclear wastes at one or more central facilities, one of them in South Carolina where it could potentially leak into the ground water of several southeastern states.

A single urban transport accident resulting in a major nuclear spill could cost thousands of lives. Current models of nuclear waste shipping casks have never been physically tested; only obsolete models containing a far less explosive form of nuclear fuel were “crash tested” for a government public relations film. Environmentalists believe that the nuclear industry should bear the full risks involved in the disposal of its own wastes. At a time of massive budget cuts for alternative energy sources, we do not need another subsidy for nuclear power. Johnston motion adopted 46-43; April 29, 1982. NO is the pro-environmental vote. (Government “AFR” storage was included in the final bill passed by Congress.)

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Alaska
2025 State Scorecard Average

11%

Arizona
2025 State Scorecard Average

89%

Arkansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

California
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Colorado
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

Connecticut
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Delaware
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Florida
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Georgia
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

Hawaii
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Idaho
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Illinois
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Indiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Iowa
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Kansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Kentucky
2025 State Scorecard Average

6%

Louisiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Maine
2025 State Scorecard Average

63%

Maryland
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Massachusetts
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Michigan
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Minnesota
2025 State Scorecard Average

94%

Mississippi
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Missouri
2025 State Scorecard Average

4%

Montana
2025 State Scorecard Average

6%

Nebraska
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Nevada
2025 State Scorecard Average

94%

New Hampshire
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

New Jersey
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

New Mexico
2025 State Scorecard Average

94%

New York
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

North Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

6%

North Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Oklahoma
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Oregon
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Pennsylvania
2025 State Scorecard Average

40%

Rhode Island
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

South Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

South Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Tennessee
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Texas
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Utah
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Vermont
2025 State Scorecard Average

96%

Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Washington
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

West Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Wisconsin
2025 State Scorecard Average

49%

Wyoming
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%