Nuclear Basing Mode

Senate Roll Call Vote 113

1981 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

No

Votes For

59

Votes Against

39

Not Voting

2

Tower (R-TX) motion to table (kill) the Levin (D-MI) – Kassenbaum (R-KS) amendment to the fiscal 1982 Defense Authorization bill to require advance approval of both houses of Congress before the funds in the bill could be spent on a basing mode for the MX Missile. This vote was taken before President Reagan cancelled the multiple protective shelter basing mode for the MX missile. To protect against a Soviet nuclear strike, the Air Force wanted to put more than 200 MX missiles in valleys in Nevada and Utah. Each missile would move continually between 4,600 shelters and 23 potential launch sites, so the Soviets would not know their exact location at any one time. This shell game is called the basing mode, and would affect 25,000 square miles of land, much of it de facto wilderness. Local ranchers and environmentalists, as well as several national environmental groups, opposed this method of basing the missiles because it meant massive withdrawals of land, boom towns, a staggering drain on the area’s water resources and an end to traditional rural lifestyles. The missiles will be almost impossible to hide unless the whole area is off limits to the public. The missiles can be used as offensive first strike weapons. The shell game basing mode could have cost $50 billion, excluding the production costs of the missile itself, money that would not then be available either for social programs or for more sensible defense programs. Motion agreed to 59-39; May 13, 1981. NO is the pro-environmental vote.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2024 State Scorecard Average

0%

Alaska
2024 State Scorecard Average

0%

Arizona
2024 State Scorecard Average

56%

Arkansas
2024 State Scorecard Average

0%

California
2024 State Scorecard Average

99%

Colorado
2024 State Scorecard Average

100%

Connecticut
2024 State Scorecard Average

100%

Delaware
2024 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
2024 State Scorecard Average

0%

Georgia
2024 State Scorecard Average

94%

Hawaii
2024 State Scorecard Average

100%

Idaho
2024 State Scorecard Average

0%

Illinois
2024 State Scorecard Average

100%

Indiana
2024 State Scorecard Average

0%

Iowa
2024 State Scorecard Average

0%

Kansas
2024 State Scorecard Average

0%

Kentucky
2024 State Scorecard Average

6%

Louisiana
2024 State Scorecard Average

0%

Maine
2024 State Scorecard Average

50%

Maryland
2024 State Scorecard Average

100%

Massachusetts
2024 State Scorecard Average

100%

Michigan
2024 State Scorecard Average

100%

Minnesota
2024 State Scorecard Average

100%

Mississippi
2024 State Scorecard Average

0%

Missouri
2024 State Scorecard Average

0%

Montana
2024 State Scorecard Average

29%

Nebraska
2024 State Scorecard Average

0%

Nevada
2024 State Scorecard Average

100%

New Hampshire
2024 State Scorecard Average

100%

New Jersey
2024 State Scorecard Average

88%

New Mexico
2024 State Scorecard Average

100%

New York
2024 State Scorecard Average

100%

North Carolina
2024 State Scorecard Average

0%

North Dakota
2024 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2024 State Scorecard Average

25%

Oklahoma
2024 State Scorecard Average

0%

Oregon
2024 State Scorecard Average

100%

Pennsylvania
2024 State Scorecard Average

94%

Rhode Island
2024 State Scorecard Average

100%

South Carolina
2024 State Scorecard Average

0%

South Dakota
2024 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
2024 State Scorecard Average

0%

Texas
2024 State Scorecard Average

0%

Utah
2024 State Scorecard Average

2%

Vermont
2024 State Scorecard Average

94%

Virginia
2024 State Scorecard Average

100%

Washington
2024 State Scorecard Average

100%

West Virginia
2024 State Scorecard Average

6%

Wisconsin
2024 State Scorecard Average

50%

Wyoming
2024 State Scorecard Average

0%