Everglades Protection

Senate Roll Call Vote 166

1990 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

No

Votes For

54

Votes Against

44

Not Voting

2

Sugar production in southern Florida damages one of our country’s natural treasures, the greater Everglades ecosystem, including Everglades National Park and the Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge. The Everglades are threatened by the nutrient-enriched water drained daily from the 700,000 acre Everglades Agricultural Area.

Sugar and other farming have already seriously polluted Lake Okeechobee and the Loxahatchee Refuge. Lake Okeechobee is the nation’s second largest natural freshwater lake, a principal drinking water source for south Florida, and the heart of the water system that has historically sustained the Everglades. Halting the pollution and the diversion of water supplies caused by the subsidized sugar industry is essential to restoring the rich and diverse aquatic ecosystem for the Everglades, and assuring a water supply for the citizens of south Florida.

This vote was on a motion to table (kill) the amendment offered by Senators Bradley (D-NJ) and Roth (R-DE) to reduce the price support for sugar from 18 cents per pound to 16 cents per pound. Subsidizing our sugar program at the current rate is contributing to the destruction of the Everglades. The Senate voted to table the amendment by a vote of 54-44 on July 24. No is the pro-environment vote.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Alaska
2025 State Scorecard Average

11%

Arizona
2025 State Scorecard Average

89%

Arkansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

California
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Colorado
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

Connecticut
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Delaware
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Florida
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Georgia
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

Hawaii
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Idaho
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Illinois
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Indiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Iowa
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Kansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Kentucky
2025 State Scorecard Average

6%

Louisiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Maine
2025 State Scorecard Average

63%

Maryland
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Massachusetts
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Michigan
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Minnesota
2025 State Scorecard Average

94%

Mississippi
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Missouri
2025 State Scorecard Average

4%

Montana
2025 State Scorecard Average

6%

Nebraska
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Nevada
2025 State Scorecard Average

94%

New Hampshire
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

New Jersey
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

New Mexico
2025 State Scorecard Average

94%

New York
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

North Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

6%

North Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Oklahoma
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Oregon
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Pennsylvania
2025 State Scorecard Average

40%

Rhode Island
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

South Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

South Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Tennessee
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Texas
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Utah
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Vermont
2025 State Scorecard Average

96%

Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

Washington
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

West Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Wisconsin
2025 State Scorecard Average

49%

Wyoming
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%