Synthetic Fossil Fuel Subsidies

House Roll Call Vote 228

1985 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

No

Votes For

179

Votes Against

251

Not Voting

3

Without more research on pollution control technologies, the commercial development of synthetic fuels from coal and oil shale would create massive environmental problems, including air pollution, groundwater contamination and disposal of huge amounts of toxic wastes. Yet in a frantic response to the oil crises of the 1970s, Congress appropriated nearly $18 billion of federal subsidies for private commercial development of synfuels, subsidies which dwarfed federal efforts to promote solar energy and conservation. This aid began to flow in the 1980s even as synfuel pollution research was being drastically cut.

As oil prices began to drop and synfuels became less and less economically competitive, Congress in 1984 cut $5.5 billion from synfuel subsidies. In 1985, environmentalists joined fiscal conservatives in trying to cut the remaining $7.5 billion in commercial synfuel subsidies, leaving $500 million for research. This vote was on a House “rule” which would have prevented an amendment from being offered to make this cut on the House floor. Rule rejected 179-251; July 24, 1985. NO is the pro-environmental vote. (Adoption of rule, H. Res. 227, for FY 1986 Interior Appropriations bill, H.R. 3011.) In the end, Congress passed and the President signed legislation abolishing commercial synfuel subsidies.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2025 State Scorecard Average

26%

Alaska
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Arizona
2025 State Scorecard Average

33%

Arkansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

California
2025 State Scorecard Average

78%

Colorado
2025 State Scorecard Average

51%

Connecticut
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Delaware
2025 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
2025 State Scorecard Average

28%

Georgia
2025 State Scorecard Average

34%

Hawaii
2025 State Scorecard Average

98%

Idaho
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Illinois
2025 State Scorecard Average

81%

Indiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

22%

Iowa
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Kansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

23%

Kentucky
2025 State Scorecard Average

19%

Louisiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

38%

Maine
2025 State Scorecard Average

76%

Maryland
2025 State Scorecard Average

85%

Massachusetts
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Michigan
2025 State Scorecard Average

44%

Minnesota
2025 State Scorecard Average

50%

Mississippi
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Missouri
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Montana
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Nebraska
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Nevada
2025 State Scorecard Average

69%

New Hampshire
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

New Jersey
2025 State Scorecard Average

73%

New Mexico
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

New York
2025 State Scorecard Average

72%

North Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

26%

North Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2025 State Scorecard Average

33%

Oklahoma
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Oregon
2025 State Scorecard Average

82%

Pennsylvania
2025 State Scorecard Average

47%

Rhode Island
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

South Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

14%

South Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
2025 State Scorecard Average

10%

Texas
2025 State Scorecard Average

31%

Utah
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Vermont
2025 State Scorecard Average

100%

Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

58%

Washington
2025 State Scorecard Average

75%

West Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Wisconsin
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Wyoming
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%