Celebrate Earth Day: Become a Sustaining Member! Join LCV Today

Synthetic Fuels from Coal

House Roll Call Vote 258

1979 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

Yes

Votes For

69

Votes Against

351

Not Voting

13

H.R. 3930. Defense Production Act. The Act used military security as an excuse for giving the U.S. Government the authority to enter into contracts with private companies for the production and commercialization of synthetic fuels from coal. The goal was to produce a million barrels a day, for general fuel needs, on the grounds that a severe fuel shortage constitutes a military threat. In fact, the military establishment has its own petroleum reserves which are adequate to supply its needs. The vote is on the Dingell amendment to limit the definition of energy production in the Act to the energy needed for military defense purposes. This would have prevented the federal government from promoting massive synthetic fuel development for commercial use. Dingell maintained that the fuel shortage did not meet his idea of a national emergency and he was reluctant to give the President such wide-ranging powers. Environmentalists have opposed the massive production of synthetic fuels, because they are less efficient, more expensive, and probably more damaging to the environment than burning coal directly and using scrubbers. They require tremendous amounts of water and would put too much carbon dioxide into the global atmosphere. The Administration opposed the Dingell amendment. Rejected 69-351. June 26, 1979. Yes is the correct vote.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2025 State Scorecard Average

26%

Alaska
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Arizona
2025 State Scorecard Average

33%

Arkansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

California
2025 State Scorecard Average

78%

Colorado
2025 State Scorecard Average

51%

Connecticut
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Delaware
2025 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
2025 State Scorecard Average

28%

Georgia
2025 State Scorecard Average

34%

Hawaii
2025 State Scorecard Average

98%

Idaho
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Illinois
2025 State Scorecard Average

81%

Indiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

22%

Iowa
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Kansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

23%

Kentucky
2025 State Scorecard Average

19%

Louisiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

38%

Maine
2025 State Scorecard Average

76%

Maryland
2025 State Scorecard Average

85%

Massachusetts
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Michigan
2025 State Scorecard Average

44%

Minnesota
2025 State Scorecard Average

50%

Mississippi
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Missouri
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Montana
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Nebraska
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Nevada
2025 State Scorecard Average

69%

New Hampshire
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

New Jersey
2025 State Scorecard Average

73%

New Mexico
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

New York
2025 State Scorecard Average

72%

North Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

26%

North Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2025 State Scorecard Average

33%

Oklahoma
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Oregon
2025 State Scorecard Average

82%

Pennsylvania
2025 State Scorecard Average

47%

Rhode Island
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

South Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

14%

South Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
2025 State Scorecard Average

10%

Texas
2025 State Scorecard Average

31%

Utah
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Vermont
2025 State Scorecard Average

100%

Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

58%

Washington
2025 State Scorecard Average

75%

West Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Wisconsin
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Wyoming
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%