Tuna / Porpoise Protection I

House Roll Call Vote 270

1977 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

Yes

Votes For

244

Votes Against

109

Not Voting

80

(H.R. 6970): The vote is on the McClosket-Bonker amendment to reduce the number of porpoises that could be killed by tuna fishermen from 78,900 down to 68,910 during 1977. The amendment also directed the Secretary of Commerce to make further quota reductions in future years. The amendment also banned the importation of fish products whose production caused dolphin kills exceeding U.S. standards. Passage of this amendment was considered a victory for environmentalists and a setback for the tuna industry, which had pressured the House Merchant Marine Fisheries Committee to increase the quotas that had previously been set by the Department of Commerce. Porpoises frequently get strangled in the purse-seine nets used to catch deep swimming yellow fin tuna. American tuna fishermen were killing over 100,000 porpoises annually, causing significant declines in population and endangering the Eastern Spinner Porpoise. Environmentalists argued that the fishermen could greatly reduce porpoise mortality through the use of proper equipment, care and timing. They were proven right when, under stricter government observation, the tuna industry killed only 28,000 porpoises this last year. Adopted 244-109. June 1, 1977. YES is the correct vote.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2025 State Scorecard Average

26%

Alaska
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Arizona
2025 State Scorecard Average

33%

Arkansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

California
2025 State Scorecard Average

78%

Colorado
2025 State Scorecard Average

51%

Connecticut
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Delaware
2025 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
2025 State Scorecard Average

28%

Georgia
2025 State Scorecard Average

34%

Hawaii
2025 State Scorecard Average

98%

Idaho
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Illinois
2025 State Scorecard Average

81%

Indiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

22%

Iowa
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Kansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

23%

Kentucky
2025 State Scorecard Average

19%

Louisiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

38%

Maine
2025 State Scorecard Average

76%

Maryland
2025 State Scorecard Average

85%

Massachusetts
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Michigan
2025 State Scorecard Average

44%

Minnesota
2025 State Scorecard Average

50%

Mississippi
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Missouri
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Montana
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Nebraska
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Nevada
2025 State Scorecard Average

69%

New Hampshire
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

New Jersey
2025 State Scorecard Average

73%

New Mexico
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

New York
2025 State Scorecard Average

72%

North Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

26%

North Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2025 State Scorecard Average

33%

Oklahoma
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Oregon
2025 State Scorecard Average

82%

Pennsylvania
2025 State Scorecard Average

47%

Rhode Island
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

South Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

14%

South Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
2025 State Scorecard Average

10%

Texas
2025 State Scorecard Average

31%

Utah
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Vermont
2025 State Scorecard Average

100%

Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

58%

Washington
2025 State Scorecard Average

75%

West Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Wisconsin
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Wyoming
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%