Cross Florida Barge Canal

House Roll Call Vote 764

1984 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

Yes

Votes For

201

Votes Against

204

Not Voting

28

For almost twenty years, environmentalists have been fighting the Cross Florida Barge Canal — one of the most grandiose and destructive projects ever dreamed up by the Army Corps of Engineers. The proposed canal connecting Florida’s Atlantic and Gulf coasts would be 110 miles long and cost over $500 million. The project had already destroyed more than a third of the beautiful Oklawaha River when construction was halted by President Nixon in 1971. Both Florida’s Governor and state legislature are now opposed to the canal. But its promoters in Congress are biding their time, and Congress has refused to kill the project.

The canal would destroy one of the richest and largest wildlife areas left in this fast growing state, including critical habitat for the manatee in the swamps and river bottom forests along the Oklawaha. Worse yet, for 28 miles this industrial barge canal would cut up to 15 feet below the water table of the Floridan aquifer. This would threaten to contaminate the main drinking water supply for millions of people in central Florida with toxics and salt water. The vote is on the Shaw amendment to deauthorize and thus kill the Cross Florida Barge Canal.

Shaw amendment rejected 201-204; June 28, 1984. YES is the pro-environmental vote. (Shaw amendment to the Water Resources Development Authorization bill, H.R. 3678.) Although the amendment lost, construction is still halted. Promoters are now cooking up a new study to try to justify the project.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2025 State Scorecard Average

26%

Alaska
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Arizona
2025 State Scorecard Average

33%

Arkansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

California
2025 State Scorecard Average

78%

Colorado
2025 State Scorecard Average

51%

Connecticut
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Delaware
2025 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
2025 State Scorecard Average

28%

Georgia
2025 State Scorecard Average

34%

Hawaii
2025 State Scorecard Average

98%

Idaho
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Illinois
2025 State Scorecard Average

81%

Indiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

22%

Iowa
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Kansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

23%

Kentucky
2025 State Scorecard Average

19%

Louisiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

38%

Maine
2025 State Scorecard Average

76%

Maryland
2025 State Scorecard Average

85%

Massachusetts
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Michigan
2025 State Scorecard Average

44%

Minnesota
2025 State Scorecard Average

50%

Mississippi
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Missouri
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Montana
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Nebraska
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Nevada
2025 State Scorecard Average

69%

New Hampshire
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

New Jersey
2025 State Scorecard Average

73%

New Mexico
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

New York
2025 State Scorecard Average

72%

North Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

26%

North Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2025 State Scorecard Average

33%

Oklahoma
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Oregon
2025 State Scorecard Average

82%

Pennsylvania
2025 State Scorecard Average

47%

Rhode Island
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

South Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

14%

South Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
2025 State Scorecard Average

10%

Texas
2025 State Scorecard Average

31%

Utah
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Vermont
2025 State Scorecard Average

100%

Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

58%

Washington
2025 State Scorecard Average

75%

West Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Wisconsin
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Wyoming
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%