Arctic National Wildlife Refuge

House Roll Call Vote 122

2005 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

Yes

Votes For

200

Votes Against

231

Not Voting

3

The protection of Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is among the highest priorities for the national environmental community. Nowhere else on our continent is the complete range of arctic and sub-arctic landscapes protected in one unbroken chain, and no other conservation area in the circumpolar north has such abundant and diverse wildlife, including rare musk oxen, polar bears, grizzlies, wolves, millions of migratory birds, and more than 120,000 caribou. The refuge’s 1.5 million-acre coastal plain has been called “America’s Serengeti.”

The Bush Administration made drilling in the Arctic Refuge a cornerstone of its national energy strategy, which reached its final form in H.R. 6, the House energy bill. On April 20, 2005, Congressman Ed Markey (D-MA) and Congresswoman Nancy Johnson (R-CT) offered an amendment to strike the Arctic drilling provision from the bill (House Amendment 72). The amendment failed by a 200-231 vote (House roll call vote 122). YES is the pro-environment vote.

In a related development, the budget resolution conference report contained instructions to open the refuge to oil and gas leasing and development. On April 28, 2005, the House voted to adopt the resolution by a 214-211 vote (House roll call vote 149). NO is the pro-environment vote.

Although the Senate then passed a budget reconciliation bill calling for Arctic Refuge drilling, a bipartisan coalition in the House forced the removal of Arctic Refuge drilling language in the final budget reconciliation bill. Finally, in a last-ditch attempt, a provision to open the refuge was added to the Defense Appropriations conference report, which included funds for both U.S. troops and hurricane relief. Voting to bring this conference report to the House floor became a de facto vote on Arctic drilling. On December 19, 2005, the House adopted the rule providing for House floor consideration by a 214-201 vote (House roll call vote 666). NO is the pro-environment vote.

The House then passed the conference report. In the Senate, however, pro-conservation Senators were successful in ensuring that the drilling provision was removed. The revised conference report was then approved by both houses, leaving the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge intact.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2005 State Scorecard Average

15%

Alaska
2005 State Scorecard Average

58%

Arizona
2005 State Scorecard Average

30%

Arkansas
2005 State Scorecard Average

4%

California
2005 State Scorecard Average

75%

Colorado
2005 State Scorecard Average

52%

Connecticut
2005 State Scorecard Average

97%

Delaware
2005 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
2005 State Scorecard Average

30%

Georgia
2005 State Scorecard Average

35%

Hawaii
2005 State Scorecard Average

98%

Idaho
2005 State Scorecard Average

5%

Illinois
2005 State Scorecard Average

81%

Indiana
2005 State Scorecard Average

24%

Iowa
2005 State Scorecard Average

5%

Kansas
2005 State Scorecard Average

25%

Kentucky
2005 State Scorecard Average

20%

Louisiana
2005 State Scorecard Average

21%

Maine
2005 State Scorecard Average

71%

Maryland
2005 State Scorecard Average

83%

Massachusetts
2005 State Scorecard Average

96%

Michigan
2005 State Scorecard Average

54%

Minnesota
2005 State Scorecard Average

47%

Mississippi
2005 State Scorecard Average

24%

Missouri
2005 State Scorecard Average

21%

Montana
2005 State Scorecard Average

2%

Nebraska
2005 State Scorecard Average

4%

Nevada
2005 State Scorecard Average

72%

New Hampshire
2005 State Scorecard Average

88%

New Jersey
2005 State Scorecard Average

78%

New Mexico
2005 State Scorecard Average

94%

New York
2005 State Scorecard Average

63%

North Carolina
2005 State Scorecard Average

47%

North Dakota
2005 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2005 State Scorecard Average

33%

Oklahoma
2005 State Scorecard Average

3%

Oregon
2005 State Scorecard Average

68%

Pennsylvania
2005 State Scorecard Average

56%

Rhode Island
2005 State Scorecard Average

100%

South Carolina
2005 State Scorecard Average

17%

South Dakota
2005 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
2005 State Scorecard Average

13%

Texas
2005 State Scorecard Average

33%

Utah
2005 State Scorecard Average

6%

Vermont
2005 State Scorecard Average

100%

Virginia
2005 State Scorecard Average

55%

Washington
2005 State Scorecard Average

72%

West Virginia
2005 State Scorecard Average

0%

Wisconsin
2005 State Scorecard Average

24%

Wyoming
2005 State Scorecard Average

3%