Clean Water Funding

House Roll Call Vote 123

2009 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

Yes

Votes For

317

Votes Against

101

Not Voting

13

Our nation’s aging water infrastructure is in need of immediate improvement — cities and states across the country are trying to cope with sewer overflows that often contain toxins and other pollutants, including microbial pathogens that threaten the public’s health.

The Clean Water State Revolving Fund is intended to help address that need by providing loans to improve our nation’s water quality through water-infrastructure improvement projects. Specifically, this program helps local communities meet water quality standards, protects public health, and helps ensure continued progress in restoring the health and safety of America’s waters by replacing old and decaying pipelines and other water infrastructure.

H.R. 1262, the Water Quality Investment Act of 2009, would fill the approximately $3.2 billion to $11.1 billion annual gap that exists between wastewater infrastructure needs and current funding through an investment of $13.8 billion in federal grants over five years. In addition, it would provide $150 million a year through 2014 to the Great Lakes Legacy Act, a program specifically designed to address sediment contamination in the Great Lakes. This legislation would also require timely notification of the public when sewer overflows occur.

On March 12, the House passed this important legislation by a vote of 317-101 (House roll call vote 123). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate did not act on companion legislation in 2009.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2009 State Scorecard Average

15%

Alaska
2009 State Scorecard Average

58%

Arizona
2009 State Scorecard Average

30%

Arkansas
2009 State Scorecard Average

4%

California
2009 State Scorecard Average

75%

Colorado
2009 State Scorecard Average

52%

Connecticut
2009 State Scorecard Average

97%

Delaware
2009 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
2009 State Scorecard Average

30%

Georgia
2009 State Scorecard Average

35%

Hawaii
2009 State Scorecard Average

98%

Idaho
2009 State Scorecard Average

5%

Illinois
2009 State Scorecard Average

81%

Indiana
2009 State Scorecard Average

24%

Iowa
2009 State Scorecard Average

5%

Kansas
2009 State Scorecard Average

25%

Kentucky
2009 State Scorecard Average

20%

Louisiana
2009 State Scorecard Average

21%

Maine
2009 State Scorecard Average

71%

Maryland
2009 State Scorecard Average

83%

Massachusetts
2009 State Scorecard Average

96%

Michigan
2009 State Scorecard Average

54%

Minnesota
2009 State Scorecard Average

47%

Mississippi
2009 State Scorecard Average

24%

Missouri
2009 State Scorecard Average

21%

Montana
2009 State Scorecard Average

2%

Nebraska
2009 State Scorecard Average

4%

Nevada
2009 State Scorecard Average

72%

New Hampshire
2009 State Scorecard Average

88%

New Jersey
2009 State Scorecard Average

78%

New Mexico
2009 State Scorecard Average

94%

New York
2009 State Scorecard Average

63%

North Carolina
2009 State Scorecard Average

47%

North Dakota
2009 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2009 State Scorecard Average

33%

Oklahoma
2009 State Scorecard Average

3%

Oregon
2009 State Scorecard Average

68%

Pennsylvania
2009 State Scorecard Average

56%

Rhode Island
2009 State Scorecard Average

100%

South Carolina
2009 State Scorecard Average

17%

South Dakota
2009 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
2009 State Scorecard Average

13%

Texas
2009 State Scorecard Average

33%

Utah
2009 State Scorecard Average

6%

Vermont
2009 State Scorecard Average

100%

Virginia
2009 State Scorecard Average

55%

Washington
2009 State Scorecard Average

72%

West Virginia
2009 State Scorecard Average

0%

Wisconsin
2009 State Scorecard Average

24%

Wyoming
2009 State Scorecard Average

3%