Climate Change and Clean Energy (2x Score)

House Roll Call Vote 477

2009 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

Yes

Votes For

219

Votes Against

212

Not Voting

3

The generational challenge of addressing global warming only grows in importance. Additionally, America faces a deepening energy crisis predicated on our growing demand for fossil fuels and our dependence on the hostile foreign nations that provide them. Absent a drastic change in the way the world uses energy, we will soon reach a tipping point from which we will not be able to reverse the course of catastrophic climate change. We have already witnessed the onset of these effects, including increases in hurricane intensity, storm frequency, and sea-level rise that threaten coastal communities. In 2009, an increased pro-environment majority in the House of Representatives and the leadership of the Obama administration led to historic progress in the fight to stop global warming.

In the spring, Representatives Henry Waxman (D-CA) and Ed Markey (D-MA) introduced H.R. 2454, the American Clean Energy and Security (ACES) Act. H.R. 2454 would reduce global warming pollution 17% from 2005 levels by 2020 and 83% by 2050. Additionally, it would mandate that 20% of American electricity consumption come from clean, renewable sources like solar and wind power, with a portion coming from gains in efficiency, by 2020. Multiple analyses showed that ACES, when paired with unprecedented clean energy investments in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, would create nearly 2 million jobs, re-energizing our economy and making America a global leader in developing the next generation of clean energy technologies.

On June 26, after months of negotiations, the House voted to adopt the American Clean Energy and Security Act by a vote of 219-212 (House roll call vote 477). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate did not bring companion legislation to the floor during 2009.

H.R. 2454 marked the first time either House of Congress passed a bill to institute an economy-wide cap on greenhouse gas emissions. Because of the historic nature of this legislation, LCV has made the decision to double-score the vote, a rarely-used practice employed only for landmark bills.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2009 State Scorecard Average

15%

Alaska
2009 State Scorecard Average

58%

Arizona
2009 State Scorecard Average

30%

Arkansas
2009 State Scorecard Average

4%

California
2009 State Scorecard Average

75%

Colorado
2009 State Scorecard Average

52%

Connecticut
2009 State Scorecard Average

97%

Delaware
2009 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
2009 State Scorecard Average

30%

Georgia
2009 State Scorecard Average

35%

Hawaii
2009 State Scorecard Average

98%

Idaho
2009 State Scorecard Average

5%

Illinois
2009 State Scorecard Average

81%

Indiana
2009 State Scorecard Average

24%

Iowa
2009 State Scorecard Average

5%

Kansas
2009 State Scorecard Average

25%

Kentucky
2009 State Scorecard Average

20%

Louisiana
2009 State Scorecard Average

21%

Maine
2009 State Scorecard Average

71%

Maryland
2009 State Scorecard Average

83%

Massachusetts
2009 State Scorecard Average

96%

Michigan
2009 State Scorecard Average

54%

Minnesota
2009 State Scorecard Average

47%

Mississippi
2009 State Scorecard Average

24%

Missouri
2009 State Scorecard Average

21%

Montana
2009 State Scorecard Average

2%

Nebraska
2009 State Scorecard Average

4%

Nevada
2009 State Scorecard Average

72%

New Hampshire
2009 State Scorecard Average

88%

New Jersey
2009 State Scorecard Average

78%

New Mexico
2009 State Scorecard Average

94%

New York
2009 State Scorecard Average

63%

North Carolina
2009 State Scorecard Average

47%

North Dakota
2009 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2009 State Scorecard Average

33%

Oklahoma
2009 State Scorecard Average

3%

Oregon
2009 State Scorecard Average

68%

Pennsylvania
2009 State Scorecard Average

56%

Rhode Island
2009 State Scorecard Average

100%

South Carolina
2009 State Scorecard Average

17%

South Dakota
2009 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
2009 State Scorecard Average

13%

Texas
2009 State Scorecard Average

33%

Utah
2009 State Scorecard Average

6%

Vermont
2009 State Scorecard Average

100%

Virginia
2009 State Scorecard Average

55%

Washington
2009 State Scorecard Average

72%

West Virginia
2009 State Scorecard Average

0%

Wisconsin
2009 State Scorecard Average

24%

Wyoming
2009 State Scorecard Average

3%