Environmental Funding Cuts

House Roll Call Vote 88

2005 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

No

Votes For

218

Votes Against

214

Not Voting

3

Issues

Robust funding for environment and natural resources stewardship is critical to keeping our air and water clean, protecting public lands, and safeguarding fish and wildlife. Unfortunately, the fiscal year 2006 budgets proposed by the Bush Administration and endorsed by congressional leaders made substantial cuts to environmental programs.

The House budget resolution, for instance, cut discretionary spending on the environment and natural resources by $2.85 billion, more than 9 percent below the previous year’s levels. By 2010, funding levels for these programs would be 21 percent below the level needed to maintain current activities. Among the hardest hit are the Land and Water Conservation Fund, as well as programs to invest in clean water infrastructure, protect oceans and coasts, and conserve agricultural lands. The resolution also allowed the Arctic Refuge to be opened up for drilling through a fast-track budget reconciliation bill.

On March 17, 2005, the House approved the budget resolution by a 218-214 vote (House roll call vote 88). NO is the pro-environment vote.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2005 State Scorecard Average

15%

Alaska
2005 State Scorecard Average

58%

Arizona
2005 State Scorecard Average

30%

Arkansas
2005 State Scorecard Average

4%

California
2005 State Scorecard Average

75%

Colorado
2005 State Scorecard Average

52%

Connecticut
2005 State Scorecard Average

97%

Delaware
2005 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
2005 State Scorecard Average

30%

Georgia
2005 State Scorecard Average

35%

Hawaii
2005 State Scorecard Average

98%

Idaho
2005 State Scorecard Average

5%

Illinois
2005 State Scorecard Average

81%

Indiana
2005 State Scorecard Average

24%

Iowa
2005 State Scorecard Average

5%

Kansas
2005 State Scorecard Average

25%

Kentucky
2005 State Scorecard Average

20%

Louisiana
2005 State Scorecard Average

21%

Maine
2005 State Scorecard Average

71%

Maryland
2005 State Scorecard Average

83%

Massachusetts
2005 State Scorecard Average

96%

Michigan
2005 State Scorecard Average

54%

Minnesota
2005 State Scorecard Average

47%

Mississippi
2005 State Scorecard Average

24%

Missouri
2005 State Scorecard Average

21%

Montana
2005 State Scorecard Average

2%

Nebraska
2005 State Scorecard Average

4%

Nevada
2005 State Scorecard Average

72%

New Hampshire
2005 State Scorecard Average

88%

New Jersey
2005 State Scorecard Average

78%

New Mexico
2005 State Scorecard Average

94%

New York
2005 State Scorecard Average

63%

North Carolina
2005 State Scorecard Average

47%

North Dakota
2005 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2005 State Scorecard Average

33%

Oklahoma
2005 State Scorecard Average

3%

Oregon
2005 State Scorecard Average

68%

Pennsylvania
2005 State Scorecard Average

56%

Rhode Island
2005 State Scorecard Average

100%

South Carolina
2005 State Scorecard Average

17%

South Dakota
2005 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
2005 State Scorecard Average

13%

Texas
2005 State Scorecard Average

33%

Utah
2005 State Scorecard Average

6%

Vermont
2005 State Scorecard Average

100%

Virginia
2005 State Scorecard Average

55%

Washington
2005 State Scorecard Average

72%

West Virginia
2005 State Scorecard Average

0%

Wisconsin
2005 State Scorecard Average

24%

Wyoming
2005 State Scorecard Average

3%