Drilling Royalties

House Roll Call Vote 167

2006 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

Yes

Votes For

252

Votes Against

165

Not Voting

15

Companies drilling for oil and natural gas on federally owned lands and in offshore waters must pay royalties to the government. These royalties fund such federal programs as the Land and Water Conservation Fund and the Historic Preservation Trust Fund while also benefiting oil-producing states and the federal treasury.

In 1995, to encourage domestic oil and gas production, Congress passed a law relieving companies drilling in the deep waters of the Gulf of Mexico from having to pay royalties. The law included a critical safety valve: when oil and natural gas prices rose above a certain amount, royalty relief would end. In 1998 and 1999, the Interior Department mistakenly awarded drilling leases that omitted this price threshold, providing unlimited royalty relief to the same oil companies that are now recording record profits.

During debate on the Interior-Environment Appropriations bill, Representative Maurice Hinchey (D-NY) offered an amendment preventing oil companies that benefit from this unlimited royalty relief from receiving future drilling leases. The amendment was meant to encourage companies to voluntarily renegotiate erroneous leases and accept limits on royalty relief. On May 18, 2006, the House voted 252-165 to approve the Hinchey amendment (House roll call vote 167). YES is the pro-environment vote. On June 29, the Senate Appropriations Committee approved a similar amendment offered by Senators Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and Judd Gregg (R-NH). At press time, the full Senate had not yet taken up the bill.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2025 State Scorecard Average

26%

Alaska
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Arizona
2025 State Scorecard Average

33%

Arkansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

California
2025 State Scorecard Average

78%

Colorado
2025 State Scorecard Average

51%

Connecticut
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Delaware
2025 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
2025 State Scorecard Average

28%

Georgia
2025 State Scorecard Average

34%

Hawaii
2025 State Scorecard Average

98%

Idaho
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Illinois
2025 State Scorecard Average

81%

Indiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

22%

Iowa
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Kansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

23%

Kentucky
2025 State Scorecard Average

19%

Louisiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

38%

Maine
2025 State Scorecard Average

76%

Maryland
2025 State Scorecard Average

85%

Massachusetts
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Michigan
2025 State Scorecard Average

44%

Minnesota
2025 State Scorecard Average

50%

Mississippi
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Missouri
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Montana
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Nebraska
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Nevada
2025 State Scorecard Average

69%

New Hampshire
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

New Jersey
2025 State Scorecard Average

73%

New Mexico
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

New York
2025 State Scorecard Average

72%

North Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

26%

North Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2025 State Scorecard Average

33%

Oklahoma
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Oregon
2025 State Scorecard Average

82%

Pennsylvania
2025 State Scorecard Average

47%

Rhode Island
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

South Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

14%

South Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
2025 State Scorecard Average

10%

Texas
2025 State Scorecard Average

31%

Utah
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Vermont
2025 State Scorecard Average

100%

Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

58%

Washington
2025 State Scorecard Average

75%

West Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Wisconsin
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Wyoming
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%