Anti-Environmental Riders

House Roll Call Vote 31

2003 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

Yes

Votes For

193

Votes Against

226

Not Voting

16

Because of the difficulty they face in enacting controversial legislation that weakens environmental laws, members of Congress often attempt to attach their anti-environment provisions to unrelated, must-pass spending bills. While the number of these anti-environmental “riders” had declined over the past several years, they sharply increased again during consideration in early 2003 of the fiscal year 2003 omnibus appropriations bill (H.J. Res 2), which included 11 of 13 bills that the 107th Congress had failed to pass before adjourning at the end of 2002.

During Senate consideration of the bill, Senator Ted Stevens (R-AK) inserted a rider to shield a court-ordered Forest Service review of possible wilderness designations in the Tongass National Forest from citizen appeal and judicial review. Other Senators added riders to authorize environmentally damaging Army Corps of Engineers projects and to exempt the renewal of the Trans-Alaska Pipeline from National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requirements. During House-Senate negotiations over the final conference report, several additional riders were added to the bill, including a measure to authorize unlimited private contracts for timber companies to log national forests. This “stewardship contracting” provision, a key element of the Bush administration’s Healthy Forests initiative, would allow widespread logging under the guise of forest management. The conference report also failed to include a longstanding provision to prohibit the use of federal funds for oil pre-leasing activities in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. In addition, the report removed more than $200 million from the Conservation Trust Fund, which provides a dedicated stream of funding for chronically underfunded national parks, wildlife refuges, open space, and historic and cultural resources.

During House floor consideration of the omnibus conference report, Representative David Obey (D-WI) offered a motion to recommit the bill with instructions for the conferees to remove the Tongass and stewardship contracting riders and restore the prohibition on Arctic leasing. On February 13, 2003, the House rejected the Obey motion by a 193-226 vote (House roll call vote 31). YES is the pro-environment vote. The House and Senate then approved the 2003 omnibus appropriations conference report with the riders intact, and the bill was signed into law later that month.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2024 State Scorecard Average

15%

Alaska
2024 State Scorecard Average

58%

Arizona
2024 State Scorecard Average

30%

Arkansas
2024 State Scorecard Average

4%

California
2024 State Scorecard Average

75%

Colorado
2024 State Scorecard Average

52%

Connecticut
2024 State Scorecard Average

97%

Delaware
2024 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
2024 State Scorecard Average

30%

Georgia
2024 State Scorecard Average

35%

Hawaii
2024 State Scorecard Average

98%

Idaho
2024 State Scorecard Average

5%

Illinois
2024 State Scorecard Average

81%

Indiana
2024 State Scorecard Average

24%

Iowa
2024 State Scorecard Average

5%

Kansas
2024 State Scorecard Average

25%

Kentucky
2024 State Scorecard Average

20%

Louisiana
2024 State Scorecard Average

21%

Maine
2024 State Scorecard Average

71%

Maryland
2024 State Scorecard Average

83%

Massachusetts
2024 State Scorecard Average

96%

Michigan
2024 State Scorecard Average

54%

Minnesota
2024 State Scorecard Average

47%

Mississippi
2024 State Scorecard Average

24%

Missouri
2024 State Scorecard Average

21%

Montana
2024 State Scorecard Average

2%

Nebraska
2024 State Scorecard Average

4%

Nevada
2024 State Scorecard Average

72%

New Hampshire
2024 State Scorecard Average

88%

New Jersey
2024 State Scorecard Average

78%

New Mexico
2024 State Scorecard Average

94%

New York
2024 State Scorecard Average

63%

North Carolina
2024 State Scorecard Average

47%

North Dakota
2024 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2024 State Scorecard Average

33%

Oklahoma
2024 State Scorecard Average

3%

Oregon
2024 State Scorecard Average

68%

Pennsylvania
2024 State Scorecard Average

56%

Rhode Island
2024 State Scorecard Average

100%

South Carolina
2024 State Scorecard Average

17%

South Dakota
2024 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
2024 State Scorecard Average

13%

Texas
2024 State Scorecard Average

33%

Utah
2024 State Scorecard Average

6%

Vermont
2024 State Scorecard Average

100%

Virginia
2024 State Scorecard Average

55%

Washington
2024 State Scorecard Average

72%

West Virginia
2024 State Scorecard Average

0%

Wisconsin
2024 State Scorecard Average

24%

Wyoming
2024 State Scorecard Average

3%