Delaware Channel Project

House Roll Call Vote 391

2003 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

Yes

Votes For

194

Votes Against

213

Not Voting

27

Despite numerous flaws in project designs and economic justifications, mounting environmental problems, and growing taxpayer concern over costs, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers continues to build wasteful and environmentally damaging dams and levees, dredge waterways and carry out “pork barrel” water resources projects.

Environmentalists have been particularly critical of a Corps project to deepen a 106-mile stretch of the Delaware River from 40 to 45 feet. Corps advocates claim the project would reduce shipping costs for six crude-oil refineries along the river. However, the project is of such dubious value that refineries would likely not pay for the dredging just to link their docks with the Corps’ deeper channel. Furthermore, the Corps plans to use three south New Jersey land sites to dispose of the 88 million cubic yards of dredge spoils from the project. These plans have triggered major concerns about local environmental impacts, prompting New Jersey’s Department of Environmental Protection to rescind a previously issued permit for the project.

A May 2002 report by the General Accounting Office found that the Corps relied on outdated information to inflate the benefits of the project, which is expected to cost at least $286 million. In December 2002, the Corps issued a “re-analysis” that again claimed the dredging project was economically justified, but outside experts once more found serious flaws with the Corps’ analysis.

During House debate of H.R. 2754, the 2004 energy and water development appropriations bill, Representative Robert Andrews (D-NJ) proposed an amendment to reduce funding for the Delaware River deepening project by $7.7 million. On July 18, 2003, the House rejected the amendment by a 194-213 vote (House roll call vote 391). Yes is the pro-environment vote. The final appropriations bill included $9 million in funding for the project; however, it also included language directing the Corps to reconsider “reprogramming” the money for other purposes. President Bush signed the appropriations bill into law on December 1, 2003.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2025 State Scorecard Average

26%

Alaska
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Arizona
2025 State Scorecard Average

33%

Arkansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

California
2025 State Scorecard Average

78%

Colorado
2025 State Scorecard Average

51%

Connecticut
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Delaware
2025 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
2025 State Scorecard Average

28%

Georgia
2025 State Scorecard Average

34%

Hawaii
2025 State Scorecard Average

98%

Idaho
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Illinois
2025 State Scorecard Average

81%

Indiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

22%

Iowa
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Kansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

23%

Kentucky
2025 State Scorecard Average

19%

Louisiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

38%

Maine
2025 State Scorecard Average

76%

Maryland
2025 State Scorecard Average

85%

Massachusetts
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Michigan
2025 State Scorecard Average

44%

Minnesota
2025 State Scorecard Average

50%

Mississippi
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Missouri
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Montana
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Nebraska
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Nevada
2025 State Scorecard Average

69%

New Hampshire
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

New Jersey
2025 State Scorecard Average

73%

New Mexico
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

New York
2025 State Scorecard Average

72%

North Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

26%

North Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2025 State Scorecard Average

33%

Oklahoma
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Oregon
2025 State Scorecard Average

82%

Pennsylvania
2025 State Scorecard Average

47%

Rhode Island
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

South Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

14%

South Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
2025 State Scorecard Average

10%

Texas
2025 State Scorecard Average

31%

Utah
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Vermont
2025 State Scorecard Average

100%

Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

58%

Washington
2025 State Scorecard Average

75%

West Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Wisconsin
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Wyoming
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%