Forest Roadless Rule

House Roll Call Vote 386

2003 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

Yes

Votes For

185

Votes Against

234

Not Voting

15

America’s national forests are subdivided by more than 380,000 miles of roads, the vast majority of them built for the logging industry and subsidized by taxpayers. These roads often degrade key fish and wildlife habitat and pollute nearby rivers, lakes and streams. In early January 2001, after three years of public hearings and public comments, the Clinton administration issued an administrative rule, known as the roadless area conservation rule, to protect some 58.5 million acres of roadless national forest lands from roadbuilding and most forms of logging.

Since coming into office, the Bush administration has sought to undermine the roadless rule through a combination of administrative initiatives and neglect. In Idaho, for instance, the Bush administration failed to defend the rule in a lawsuit filed by Boise Corporation and the state of Idaho. More recently, the Justice Department filed an amicus brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals urging the court to deny standing to environmental organizations appealing an injunction against the rule.

Earlier this year, the Bush administration unveiled a draft proposal to drop roadless protections for the globally significant Tongass National Forest in Alaska. Plans are now underway to drop protections for Alaska’s Chugach National Forest, America’s second largest forest, and to allow governors to petition the administration for similar exemptions for national forests in their own states. Meanwhile, the Forest Service is planning nearly 50 timber sales in Tongass old-growth forests that should be protected by the rule.

In response to these policy rollbacks, Representative Jay Inslee (D-WA) offered an amendment to H.R. 2691, the 2004 Interior appropriations bill, to prohibit the administration from expending any federal funds to make changes to the roadless rule as it was originally published. On July 17, 2003, the House rejected the Inslee amendment by a 185-234 vote (House roll call vote 386). YES is the pro-environment vote. In December 2003, the Bush administration published a proposed rule that would exempt the Tongass National Forest from the roadless rule.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2025 State Scorecard Average

26%

Alaska
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Arizona
2025 State Scorecard Average

33%

Arkansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

California
2025 State Scorecard Average

78%

Colorado
2025 State Scorecard Average

51%

Connecticut
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Delaware
2025 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
2025 State Scorecard Average

28%

Georgia
2025 State Scorecard Average

34%

Hawaii
2025 State Scorecard Average

98%

Idaho
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Illinois
2025 State Scorecard Average

81%

Indiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

22%

Iowa
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Kansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

23%

Kentucky
2025 State Scorecard Average

19%

Louisiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

38%

Maine
2025 State Scorecard Average

76%

Maryland
2025 State Scorecard Average

85%

Massachusetts
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Michigan
2025 State Scorecard Average

44%

Minnesota
2025 State Scorecard Average

50%

Mississippi
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Missouri
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Montana
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Nebraska
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Nevada
2025 State Scorecard Average

69%

New Hampshire
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

New Jersey
2025 State Scorecard Average

73%

New Mexico
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

New York
2025 State Scorecard Average

72%

North Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

26%

North Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2025 State Scorecard Average

33%

Oklahoma
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Oregon
2025 State Scorecard Average

82%

Pennsylvania
2025 State Scorecard Average

47%

Rhode Island
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

South Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

14%

South Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
2025 State Scorecard Average

10%

Texas
2025 State Scorecard Average

31%

Utah
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Vermont
2025 State Scorecard Average

100%

Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

58%

Washington
2025 State Scorecard Average

75%

West Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Wisconsin
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Wyoming
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%