Gulf of Mexico Fisheries Management

House Roll Call Vote 395

1998 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

No

Votes For

141

Votes Against

283

Not Voting

10

Bycatch reduction devices (BRDs) are trapdoors in shrimp trawl nets that reduce the incidental catch of marine animals other than shrimp by allowing them to escape. The use of the devices is considered crucial to protecting biological resources in the Gulf of Mexico. For every pound of shrimp caught in the Gulf of Mexico without use of a BRD, more than four pounds of juvenile fish and other marine organisms are discarded to die. For example, more than 80% of the Gulf ‘s juvenile red snappers are caught and discarded each year by trawlers without BRDs.

Experience on commercial shrimp boats has demonstrated that BRDs can cut bycatch in half without significant shrimp loss. In the spring of 1998, in compliance with the newly reauthorized Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, the National Marine Fisheries Service issued a regulation requiring BRDs for trawling in most federally managed waters in the Gulf of Mexico.

Rep. Sonny Callahan (R-AL) introduced H.R. 3735, a bill to nullify the BRD requirement in the Gulf. Later, Rep. Callahan attached a rider to the Fiscal Year 1999 Commerce, State, Justice appropriations bill, H.R. 4276, to extend state fisheries jurisdiction from three to nine miles from shore. This would, in effect, transfer management jurisdiction over a large section of the Gulf from the federal government to the states of Alabama, Mississippi, and Louisiana. None of these states have BRD requirements in their waters, nor do they have the statutes, funding, or capabilities to properly manage large-scale fisheries.

On August 5, 1998, Rep. Callahan, with the support of Reps. Billy Tauzin (R-LA) and Bob Livingston (R-LA), made a motion to substitute new language for the existing rider. The new language would achieve the same purpose as the existing rider but without amending the Magnuson Act. Rep. Wayne Gilchrest (R-MD) argued against the substitute amendment because, under House procedures, he had to defeat it before being allowed to strike the original rider. On August 5, 1998, the House defeated Rep. Callahan’s substitute amendment, 141 – 283. NO is the pro-environment vote. Rep. Callahan then accepted a motion by Rep. Gilchrest to strike the original rider on a voice vote.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
1998 State Scorecard Average

15%

Alaska
1998 State Scorecard Average

58%

Arizona
1998 State Scorecard Average

30%

Arkansas
1998 State Scorecard Average

4%

California
1998 State Scorecard Average

75%

Colorado
1998 State Scorecard Average

52%

Connecticut
1998 State Scorecard Average

97%

Delaware
1998 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
1998 State Scorecard Average

30%

Georgia
1998 State Scorecard Average

35%

Hawaii
1998 State Scorecard Average

98%

Idaho
1998 State Scorecard Average

5%

Illinois
1998 State Scorecard Average

81%

Indiana
1998 State Scorecard Average

24%

Iowa
1998 State Scorecard Average

5%

Kansas
1998 State Scorecard Average

25%

Kentucky
1998 State Scorecard Average

20%

Louisiana
1998 State Scorecard Average

21%

Maine
1998 State Scorecard Average

71%

Maryland
1998 State Scorecard Average

83%

Massachusetts
1998 State Scorecard Average

96%

Michigan
1998 State Scorecard Average

54%

Minnesota
1998 State Scorecard Average

47%

Mississippi
1998 State Scorecard Average

24%

Missouri
1998 State Scorecard Average

21%

Montana
1998 State Scorecard Average

2%

Nebraska
1998 State Scorecard Average

4%

Nevada
1998 State Scorecard Average

72%

New Hampshire
1998 State Scorecard Average

88%

New Jersey
1998 State Scorecard Average

78%

New Mexico
1998 State Scorecard Average

94%

New York
1998 State Scorecard Average

63%

North Carolina
1998 State Scorecard Average

47%

North Dakota
1998 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
1998 State Scorecard Average

33%

Oklahoma
1998 State Scorecard Average

3%

Oregon
1998 State Scorecard Average

68%

Pennsylvania
1998 State Scorecard Average

56%

Rhode Island
1998 State Scorecard Average

100%

South Carolina
1998 State Scorecard Average

17%

South Dakota
1998 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
1998 State Scorecard Average

13%

Texas
1998 State Scorecard Average

33%

Utah
1998 State Scorecard Average

6%

Vermont
1998 State Scorecard Average

100%

Virginia
1998 State Scorecard Average

55%

Washington
1998 State Scorecard Average

72%

West Virginia
1998 State Scorecard Average

0%

Wisconsin
1998 State Scorecard Average

24%

Wyoming
1998 State Scorecard Average

3%