Klamath Wildlife Refuge Farming Leases

House Roll Call Vote 380

2003 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

Yes

Votes For

197

Votes Against

228

Not Voting

9

The Klamath basin of Oregon and California hosts up to 80 percent of the Pacific flyway’s waterfowl and the greatest concentration of wintering bald eagles in the continental United States. Salmon spawn in portions of the Klamath River and its tributaries, and the basin’s six national wildlife refuges are among the most important migratory bird habitat in the country.

Unfortunately, more than 20,000 acres of these refuges have been leased to commercial farming enterprises that use 56 different pesticides, including several known carcinogens, neurotoxins, and endocrine disrupters to grow crops that use vast amounts of scarce water supplies, forcing refuge marshes to go dry periodically. In addition, runoff from agricultural chemicals and erosion of farmland further degrade water quality in both the refuges and the Klamath River.

To help address these problems, Representatives Earl Blumenauer (D-OR), Mike Thompson (D-CA), and Chris Shays (R-CT) offered an amendment to H.R. 2691, the 2004 Interior appropriations bill, that would have prohibited the Fish and Wildlife Service from issuing new commercial agriculture leases in the Klamath basin for crops that have severe environmental impacts. At the same time, it would have permitted the growing of crops that provide some benefits to wildlife, in a manner consistent with farming practices on other national wildlife refuges. On July 17, 2003, the House rejected the amendment by a 197-228 vote (House roll call vote 380). YES is the pro-environment vote.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2003 State Scorecard Average

15%

Alaska
2003 State Scorecard Average

58%

Arizona
2003 State Scorecard Average

30%

Arkansas
2003 State Scorecard Average

4%

California
2003 State Scorecard Average

75%

Colorado
2003 State Scorecard Average

52%

Connecticut
2003 State Scorecard Average

97%

Delaware
2003 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
2003 State Scorecard Average

30%

Georgia
2003 State Scorecard Average

35%

Hawaii
2003 State Scorecard Average

98%

Idaho
2003 State Scorecard Average

5%

Illinois
2003 State Scorecard Average

81%

Indiana
2003 State Scorecard Average

24%

Iowa
2003 State Scorecard Average

5%

Kansas
2003 State Scorecard Average

25%

Kentucky
2003 State Scorecard Average

20%

Louisiana
2003 State Scorecard Average

21%

Maine
2003 State Scorecard Average

71%

Maryland
2003 State Scorecard Average

83%

Massachusetts
2003 State Scorecard Average

96%

Michigan
2003 State Scorecard Average

54%

Minnesota
2003 State Scorecard Average

47%

Mississippi
2003 State Scorecard Average

24%

Missouri
2003 State Scorecard Average

21%

Montana
2003 State Scorecard Average

2%

Nebraska
2003 State Scorecard Average

4%

Nevada
2003 State Scorecard Average

72%

New Hampshire
2003 State Scorecard Average

88%

New Jersey
2003 State Scorecard Average

78%

New Mexico
2003 State Scorecard Average

94%

New York
2003 State Scorecard Average

63%

North Carolina
2003 State Scorecard Average

47%

North Dakota
2003 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2003 State Scorecard Average

33%

Oklahoma
2003 State Scorecard Average

3%

Oregon
2003 State Scorecard Average

68%

Pennsylvania
2003 State Scorecard Average

56%

Rhode Island
2003 State Scorecard Average

100%

South Carolina
2003 State Scorecard Average

17%

South Dakota
2003 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
2003 State Scorecard Average

13%

Texas
2003 State Scorecard Average

33%

Utah
2003 State Scorecard Average

6%

Vermont
2003 State Scorecard Average

100%

Virginia
2003 State Scorecard Average

55%

Washington
2003 State Scorecard Average

72%

West Virginia
2003 State Scorecard Average

0%

Wisconsin
2003 State Scorecard Average

24%

Wyoming
2003 State Scorecard Average

3%