Restricting New Health and Safety Precautions

House Roll Call Vote 160

1998 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

No

Votes For

279

Votes Against

132

Not Voting

21

In 1995, Congress passed the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, which requires the Congressional Budget Office to report to government and the private sector the costs of complying with directives contained in new legislative proposals. The law also allows Members of Congress to raise a procedural hurdle–a point of order–on bills costing state and local governments more than $50 million to comply.

This point of order currently does not apply when the costs are borne by the private sector. However, the Mandates Information Act, H.R. 3534, sponsored by Rep. Gary Condit (D-CA), would expand on the existing law by establishing a new point of order against legislation that imposes costs of more than $100 million on the private sector. The bill would create a legislative procedure allowing Members of Congress to kill important new health and safety protections before they can be voted on.

The Mandates Information Act focuses exclusively on costs, but environmentalists believe that certain costs are not easily quantified, such as the extermination of a species or the costs of reducing the risks of birth defects and premature deaths. Nor does the bill consider whether the affected companies benefited financially from creating the pollution in the first place. This new hurdle could impede important legislation such as proposals to expand the public’s right to know about toxics in their communities or efforts to address pollution in lakes and rivers.

On May 19, 1998, the House passed H.R. 3534, 279 – 132. NO is the pro-environment vote.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
1998 State Scorecard Average

15%

Alaska
1998 State Scorecard Average

58%

Arizona
1998 State Scorecard Average

30%

Arkansas
1998 State Scorecard Average

4%

California
1998 State Scorecard Average

75%

Colorado
1998 State Scorecard Average

52%

Connecticut
1998 State Scorecard Average

97%

Delaware
1998 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
1998 State Scorecard Average

30%

Georgia
1998 State Scorecard Average

35%

Hawaii
1998 State Scorecard Average

98%

Idaho
1998 State Scorecard Average

5%

Illinois
1998 State Scorecard Average

81%

Indiana
1998 State Scorecard Average

24%

Iowa
1998 State Scorecard Average

5%

Kansas
1998 State Scorecard Average

25%

Kentucky
1998 State Scorecard Average

20%

Louisiana
1998 State Scorecard Average

21%

Maine
1998 State Scorecard Average

71%

Maryland
1998 State Scorecard Average

83%

Massachusetts
1998 State Scorecard Average

96%

Michigan
1998 State Scorecard Average

54%

Minnesota
1998 State Scorecard Average

47%

Mississippi
1998 State Scorecard Average

24%

Missouri
1998 State Scorecard Average

21%

Montana
1998 State Scorecard Average

2%

Nebraska
1998 State Scorecard Average

4%

Nevada
1998 State Scorecard Average

72%

New Hampshire
1998 State Scorecard Average

88%

New Jersey
1998 State Scorecard Average

78%

New Mexico
1998 State Scorecard Average

94%

New York
1998 State Scorecard Average

63%

North Carolina
1998 State Scorecard Average

47%

North Dakota
1998 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
1998 State Scorecard Average

33%

Oklahoma
1998 State Scorecard Average

3%

Oregon
1998 State Scorecard Average

68%

Pennsylvania
1998 State Scorecard Average

56%

Rhode Island
1998 State Scorecard Average

100%

South Carolina
1998 State Scorecard Average

17%

South Dakota
1998 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
1998 State Scorecard Average

13%

Texas
1998 State Scorecard Average

33%

Utah
1998 State Scorecard Average

6%

Vermont
1998 State Scorecard Average

100%

Virginia
1998 State Scorecard Average

55%

Washington
1998 State Scorecard Average

72%

West Virginia
1998 State Scorecard Average

0%

Wisconsin
1998 State Scorecard Average

24%

Wyoming
1998 State Scorecard Average

3%