Stopping the Timber Giveaway

House Roll Call Vote 323

1993 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

Yes

Votes For

164

Votes Against

259

Not Voting

10

The federal government has sanctioned tremendous environmental damage through its proposals to send or give away timber on public lands. The resulting clear-cutting destroys wildlife habitat. New logging roads slice through the last large unprotected tracts of undeveloped forests. Silt runs off roads, clogging valuable trout and salmon streams and threatening commercial fisheries that contribute over $1 billion to the nation’s economy. The silt invades clean water supplies for homes and industries.

To make matters worse, taxpayers lost nearly $1.1 billion in the last five years on below-cost timber sales from federal lands. The Forest Service not only sells timber below its cost of preparing it for sale, but subsidizes the construction of an extensive network of roads to get the logs out. According to testimony before Congress, these activities waste a major portion of taxpayers dollars given to the Forest Service. In fiscal 1992 alone, the losses reached $350 million in 101 national forests.

In an amendment to the fiscal 1994 Interior Appropriations bill, Rep. John Potter (R-IL), joined by Reps. Mike Synar (D-OK) and Lynn Schenk (D-CA), attempted to cut funding for the Forest Service by $11.9 million to discourage these destructive below-cost timber sales. The Porter amendment was rejected 164-262 on July 14, 1993. YES is the pro-environmental vote.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2024 State Scorecard Average

15%

Alaska
2024 State Scorecard Average

58%

Arizona
2024 State Scorecard Average

30%

Arkansas
2024 State Scorecard Average

4%

California
2024 State Scorecard Average

75%

Colorado
2024 State Scorecard Average

52%

Connecticut
2024 State Scorecard Average

97%

Delaware
2024 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
2024 State Scorecard Average

30%

Georgia
2024 State Scorecard Average

35%

Hawaii
2024 State Scorecard Average

98%

Idaho
2024 State Scorecard Average

5%

Illinois
2024 State Scorecard Average

81%

Indiana
2024 State Scorecard Average

24%

Iowa
2024 State Scorecard Average

5%

Kansas
2024 State Scorecard Average

25%

Kentucky
2024 State Scorecard Average

20%

Louisiana
2024 State Scorecard Average

21%

Maine
2024 State Scorecard Average

71%

Maryland
2024 State Scorecard Average

83%

Massachusetts
2024 State Scorecard Average

96%

Michigan
2024 State Scorecard Average

54%

Minnesota
2024 State Scorecard Average

47%

Mississippi
2024 State Scorecard Average

24%

Missouri
2024 State Scorecard Average

21%

Montana
2024 State Scorecard Average

2%

Nebraska
2024 State Scorecard Average

4%

Nevada
2024 State Scorecard Average

72%

New Hampshire
2024 State Scorecard Average

88%

New Jersey
2024 State Scorecard Average

78%

New Mexico
2024 State Scorecard Average

94%

New York
2024 State Scorecard Average

63%

North Carolina
2024 State Scorecard Average

47%

North Dakota
2024 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2024 State Scorecard Average

33%

Oklahoma
2024 State Scorecard Average

3%

Oregon
2024 State Scorecard Average

68%

Pennsylvania
2024 State Scorecard Average

56%

Rhode Island
2024 State Scorecard Average

100%

South Carolina
2024 State Scorecard Average

17%

South Dakota
2024 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
2024 State Scorecard Average

13%

Texas
2024 State Scorecard Average

33%

Utah
2024 State Scorecard Average

6%

Vermont
2024 State Scorecard Average

100%

Virginia
2024 State Scorecard Average

55%

Washington
2024 State Scorecard Average

72%

West Virginia
2024 State Scorecard Average

0%

Wisconsin
2024 State Scorecard Average

24%

Wyoming
2024 State Scorecard Average

3%