Columbia Basin Land Management

House Roll Call Vote 279

2000 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

No

Votes For

206

Votes Against

221

Not Voting

7

A provision added to the Fiscal Year 2001 House Interior appropriations bill by Representative George Nethercutt (R-WA) sought to expand a provision from the 1995 Contract With America, the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA), to include federal land use planning activities. SBREFA requires the federal government to ensure that its activities do not adversely impact small businesses. The Nethercutt amendment would have delayed completion of the Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Plan, an inter-agency effort to reverse the decline of Pacific Northwest salmon stocks and old-growth forests, by requiring the Forest Service to ensure that the plan did not adversely effect small businesses in the area.

While environmentalists do not, in general, support the Columbia Basin plan, they argued that the new language would set a dangerous precedent by requiring burdensome new analysis for any management plans on national forest land–and possibly on other public lands. Such plans already receive extensive analysis and public review under the National Environmental Policy Act and under the statutes of individual agencies. However, forest plans do not currently have to comply with the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.

Representative Norm Dicks (D-WA) offered an amendment to strike the Columbia Basin provision and a harmful national monuments provision from the bill (see House vote 2). In response, Representative Nethercutt offered a substitute amendment to keep the language in the bill. On June 15, 2000, the House rejected the Nethercutt amendment by a vote of 206–221 (House roll call vote 279). NO is the pro-environment vote. Later that evening, the House leadership announced that there would be no more votes that night and many Representatives left for the day. Representative Nethercutt then introduced an amendment to restore his Columbia Basin language, which passed by a vote of 197 to 180. However, the provision was dropped from the bill in conference between the House and Senate in favor of another delaying tactic–a provision requiring federal agencies to show how the Columbia Basin plan will affect fire outbreaks in the region. The Interior conference report passed the House and Senate in October and was signed by the President.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2025 State Scorecard Average

26%

Alaska
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Arizona
2025 State Scorecard Average

33%

Arkansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

California
2025 State Scorecard Average

78%

Colorado
2025 State Scorecard Average

51%

Connecticut
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Delaware
2025 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
2025 State Scorecard Average

28%

Georgia
2025 State Scorecard Average

34%

Hawaii
2025 State Scorecard Average

98%

Idaho
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Illinois
2025 State Scorecard Average

81%

Indiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

22%

Iowa
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Kansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

23%

Kentucky
2025 State Scorecard Average

19%

Louisiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

38%

Maine
2025 State Scorecard Average

76%

Maryland
2025 State Scorecard Average

85%

Massachusetts
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Michigan
2025 State Scorecard Average

44%

Minnesota
2025 State Scorecard Average

50%

Mississippi
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Missouri
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Montana
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Nebraska
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Nevada
2025 State Scorecard Average

69%

New Hampshire
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

New Jersey
2025 State Scorecard Average

73%

New Mexico
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

New York
2025 State Scorecard Average

72%

North Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

26%

North Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2025 State Scorecard Average

33%

Oklahoma
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Oregon
2025 State Scorecard Average

82%

Pennsylvania
2025 State Scorecard Average

47%

Rhode Island
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

South Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

14%

South Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
2025 State Scorecard Average

10%

Texas
2025 State Scorecard Average

31%

Utah
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Vermont
2025 State Scorecard Average

100%

Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

58%

Washington
2025 State Scorecard Average

75%

West Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Wisconsin
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Wyoming
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%