Columbia Basin Land Management

House Roll Call Vote 279

2000 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

No

Votes For

206

Votes Against

221

Not Voting

7

A provision added to the Fiscal Year 2001 House Interior appropriations bill by Representative George Nethercutt (R-WA) sought to expand a provision from the 1995 Contract With America, the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA), to include federal land use planning activities. SBREFA requires the federal government to ensure that its activities do not adversely impact small businesses. The Nethercutt amendment would have delayed completion of the Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Plan, an inter-agency effort to reverse the decline of Pacific Northwest salmon stocks and old-growth forests, by requiring the Forest Service to ensure that the plan did not adversely effect small businesses in the area.

While environmentalists do not, in general, support the Columbia Basin plan, they argued that the new language would set a dangerous precedent by requiring burdensome new analysis for any management plans on national forest land–and possibly on other public lands. Such plans already receive extensive analysis and public review under the National Environmental Policy Act and under the statutes of individual agencies. However, forest plans do not currently have to comply with the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.

Representative Norm Dicks (D-WA) offered an amendment to strike the Columbia Basin provision and a harmful national monuments provision from the bill (see House vote 2). In response, Representative Nethercutt offered a substitute amendment to keep the language in the bill. On June 15, 2000, the House rejected the Nethercutt amendment by a vote of 206–221 (House roll call vote 279). NO is the pro-environment vote. Later that evening, the House leadership announced that there would be no more votes that night and many Representatives left for the day. Representative Nethercutt then introduced an amendment to restore his Columbia Basin language, which passed by a vote of 197 to 180. However, the provision was dropped from the bill in conference between the House and Senate in favor of another delaying tactic–a provision requiring federal agencies to show how the Columbia Basin plan will affect fire outbreaks in the region. The Interior conference report passed the House and Senate in October and was signed by the President.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2024 State Scorecard Average

15%

Alaska
2024 State Scorecard Average

58%

Arizona
2024 State Scorecard Average

30%

Arkansas
2024 State Scorecard Average

4%

California
2024 State Scorecard Average

75%

Colorado
2024 State Scorecard Average

52%

Connecticut
2024 State Scorecard Average

97%

Delaware
2024 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
2024 State Scorecard Average

30%

Georgia
2024 State Scorecard Average

35%

Hawaii
2024 State Scorecard Average

98%

Idaho
2024 State Scorecard Average

5%

Illinois
2024 State Scorecard Average

81%

Indiana
2024 State Scorecard Average

24%

Iowa
2024 State Scorecard Average

5%

Kansas
2024 State Scorecard Average

25%

Kentucky
2024 State Scorecard Average

20%

Louisiana
2024 State Scorecard Average

21%

Maine
2024 State Scorecard Average

71%

Maryland
2024 State Scorecard Average

83%

Massachusetts
2024 State Scorecard Average

96%

Michigan
2024 State Scorecard Average

54%

Minnesota
2024 State Scorecard Average

47%

Mississippi
2024 State Scorecard Average

24%

Missouri
2024 State Scorecard Average

21%

Montana
2024 State Scorecard Average

2%

Nebraska
2024 State Scorecard Average

4%

Nevada
2024 State Scorecard Average

72%

New Hampshire
2024 State Scorecard Average

88%

New Jersey
2024 State Scorecard Average

78%

New Mexico
2024 State Scorecard Average

94%

New York
2024 State Scorecard Average

63%

North Carolina
2024 State Scorecard Average

47%

North Dakota
2024 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2024 State Scorecard Average

33%

Oklahoma
2024 State Scorecard Average

3%

Oregon
2024 State Scorecard Average

68%

Pennsylvania
2024 State Scorecard Average

56%

Rhode Island
2024 State Scorecard Average

100%

South Carolina
2024 State Scorecard Average

17%

South Dakota
2024 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
2024 State Scorecard Average

13%

Texas
2024 State Scorecard Average

33%

Utah
2024 State Scorecard Average

6%

Vermont
2024 State Scorecard Average

100%

Virginia
2024 State Scorecard Average

55%

Washington
2024 State Scorecard Average

72%

West Virginia
2024 State Scorecard Average

0%

Wisconsin
2024 State Scorecard Average

24%

Wyoming
2024 State Scorecard Average

3%