Endangered Species Act

1992 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

Yes

Votes For

104

Votes Against

330

Issues

The Endangered Species Act (ESA) was enacted in 1973 to preserve and protect threatened and endangered species and the ecosystems upon which they depend. Scientists estimate that scores of species worldwide become extinct every day. The ESA is our nation’s bulwark against this tide of extinction; however, there are several reasons for the continuing loss of our nation’s species. The Endangered Species Act is grossly underfunded; therefore, species may be “”listed”” as threatened or endangered, but it may take up to 10 years to implement a recovery plan. Agencies can fail to implement recovery of species in a timely manner because many duties that the Act assigns to the Executive Branch do not have deadlines. Moreover, implementation of the law has focused largely on individual species rather than ecosystems.

Representatives Gary Studds (D, MA-10), John Dingell (D, MI-16), and other Members have introduced the Endangered Species Act Amendments of 1992 (H.R. 4045) to reauthorize and strengthen the ESA. H.R. 4045 would set deadlines for the timely development and implementation of recovery plans. The Amendments give priority to developing recovery plans and habitat conservation plans for ecosystems, strengthening enforcement and authorizing increased funding to implement the ESA.

The League of Conservation Voters considers cosponsorship of H.R. 4045 to be a very strong indication of support for biodiversity protection. Currently, 108 Representatives have cosponsored the Endangered Species Act Amendments.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2025 State Scorecard Average

26%

Alaska
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Arizona
2025 State Scorecard Average

33%

Arkansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

California
2025 State Scorecard Average

78%

Colorado
2025 State Scorecard Average

51%

Connecticut
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Delaware
2025 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
2025 State Scorecard Average

28%

Georgia
2025 State Scorecard Average

34%

Hawaii
2025 State Scorecard Average

98%

Idaho
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Illinois
2025 State Scorecard Average

81%

Indiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

22%

Iowa
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Kansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

23%

Kentucky
2025 State Scorecard Average

19%

Louisiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

38%

Maine
2025 State Scorecard Average

76%

Maryland
2025 State Scorecard Average

85%

Massachusetts
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Michigan
2025 State Scorecard Average

44%

Minnesota
2025 State Scorecard Average

50%

Mississippi
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Missouri
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Montana
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Nebraska
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Nevada
2025 State Scorecard Average

69%

New Hampshire
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

New Jersey
2025 State Scorecard Average

73%

New Mexico
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

New York
2025 State Scorecard Average

72%

North Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

26%

North Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2025 State Scorecard Average

33%

Oklahoma
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Oregon
2025 State Scorecard Average

82%

Pennsylvania
2025 State Scorecard Average

47%

Rhode Island
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

South Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

14%

South Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
2025 State Scorecard Average

10%

Texas
2025 State Scorecard Average

31%

Utah
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Vermont
2025 State Scorecard Average

100%

Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

58%

Washington
2025 State Scorecard Average

75%

West Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Wisconsin
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Wyoming
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%