Grazing Subsidy

House Roll Call Vote 546

1997 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

Yes

Votes For

205

Votes Against

219

Not Voting

8

Privately owned domestic livestock graze on approximately 250 million acres of public land. Excessive grazing by domestic cattle and sheep damages fish and wildlife habitat on our federal lands and is contributing to declines in wildlife populations, including desert tortoise, Sonoran pronghorn antelope, and numerous bird species. In addition, overgrazing destroys native vegetation, and the livestock pollute streams, cause erosion, and interfere with recreation activities.

Grazing regulation is currently administered by land managing agencies (primarily the Bureau of Land Management and the Forest Service) under broad statutory authority. Fees are limited by law and are adjusted by the Secretaries of Agriculture and the Interior. When President Clinton and Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt attempted to reform grazing practices and fees in 1993, their efforts provoked a bitter fight with Congress, where they were blocked. Secretary Babbitt then attempted more modest reforms over the next two years. The legislation before the 105th Congress, H.R. 2493, prevents Secretary Babbitt, or future administrations, from achieving needed reforms by locking in current practices and fees by statute.

For decades, western livestock operators have paid a fee far below fair market value for grazing cattle and sheep on federal rangelands. The federal government subsidies encourage overgrazing by setting the fee far lower than fair market value, which allows ranchers to graze more livestock, resulting in widespread environmental damage to the public’s fish, wildlife, and water resources on millions of acres of our national forests and public lands. Below-market fees also cost U.S. taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars in lost revenues each year. It is estimated that the federal government loses approximately $4.00 for every $1.00 spent to administer the grazing program on federal lands.

During House consideration of H.R. 2493, Rep. Scott Klug (R-WI) offered an amendment to require livestock operators to pay a fee equal to the state grazing fee for the state in which the federal lands are located. State grazing fees in every western state are higher than the federal fee. In 1996, state fees ranged from just over $2.00 to more than $7.00 per adult cow per month.

On October 30, 1997, the House defeated the Klug amendment, 205-219. Yes is the pro-environment vote.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
1997 State Scorecard Average

15%

Alaska
1997 State Scorecard Average

58%

Arizona
1997 State Scorecard Average

30%

Arkansas
1997 State Scorecard Average

4%

California
1997 State Scorecard Average

75%

Colorado
1997 State Scorecard Average

52%

Connecticut
1997 State Scorecard Average

97%

Delaware
1997 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
1997 State Scorecard Average

30%

Georgia
1997 State Scorecard Average

35%

Hawaii
1997 State Scorecard Average

98%

Idaho
1997 State Scorecard Average

5%

Illinois
1997 State Scorecard Average

81%

Indiana
1997 State Scorecard Average

24%

Iowa
1997 State Scorecard Average

5%

Kansas
1997 State Scorecard Average

25%

Kentucky
1997 State Scorecard Average

20%

Louisiana
1997 State Scorecard Average

21%

Maine
1997 State Scorecard Average

71%

Maryland
1997 State Scorecard Average

83%

Massachusetts
1997 State Scorecard Average

96%

Michigan
1997 State Scorecard Average

54%

Minnesota
1997 State Scorecard Average

47%

Mississippi
1997 State Scorecard Average

24%

Missouri
1997 State Scorecard Average

21%

Montana
1997 State Scorecard Average

2%

Nebraska
1997 State Scorecard Average

4%

Nevada
1997 State Scorecard Average

72%

New Hampshire
1997 State Scorecard Average

88%

New Jersey
1997 State Scorecard Average

78%

New Mexico
1997 State Scorecard Average

94%

New York
1997 State Scorecard Average

63%

North Carolina
1997 State Scorecard Average

47%

North Dakota
1997 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
1997 State Scorecard Average

33%

Oklahoma
1997 State Scorecard Average

3%

Oregon
1997 State Scorecard Average

68%

Pennsylvania
1997 State Scorecard Average

56%

Rhode Island
1997 State Scorecard Average

100%

South Carolina
1997 State Scorecard Average

17%

South Dakota
1997 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
1997 State Scorecard Average

13%

Texas
1997 State Scorecard Average

33%

Utah
1997 State Scorecard Average

6%

Vermont
1997 State Scorecard Average

100%

Virginia
1997 State Scorecard Average

55%

Washington
1997 State Scorecard Average

72%

West Virginia
1997 State Scorecard Average

0%

Wisconsin
1997 State Scorecard Average

24%

Wyoming
1997 State Scorecard Average

3%