Klamath Wildlife Refuge Farming Leases

House Roll Call Vote 380

2003 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

Yes

Votes For

197

Votes Against

228

Not Voting

9

The Klamath basin of Oregon and California hosts up to 80 percent of the Pacific flyway’s waterfowl and the greatest concentration of wintering bald eagles in the continental United States. Salmon spawn in portions of the Klamath River and its tributaries, and the basin’s six national wildlife refuges are among the most important migratory bird habitat in the country.

Unfortunately, more than 20,000 acres of these refuges have been leased to commercial farming enterprises that use 56 different pesticides, including several known carcinogens, neurotoxins, and endocrine disrupters to grow crops that use vast amounts of scarce water supplies, forcing refuge marshes to go dry periodically. In addition, runoff from agricultural chemicals and erosion of farmland further degrade water quality in both the refuges and the Klamath River.

To help address these problems, Representatives Earl Blumenauer (D-OR), Mike Thompson (D-CA), and Chris Shays (R-CT) offered an amendment to H.R. 2691, the 2004 Interior appropriations bill, that would have prohibited the Fish and Wildlife Service from issuing new commercial agriculture leases in the Klamath basin for crops that have severe environmental impacts. At the same time, it would have permitted the growing of crops that provide some benefits to wildlife, in a manner consistent with farming practices on other national wildlife refuges. On July 17, 2003, the House rejected the amendment by a 197-228 vote (House roll call vote 380). YES is the pro-environment vote.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2025 State Scorecard Average

26%

Alaska
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Arizona
2025 State Scorecard Average

33%

Arkansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

California
2025 State Scorecard Average

78%

Colorado
2025 State Scorecard Average

51%

Connecticut
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Delaware
2025 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
2025 State Scorecard Average

28%

Georgia
2025 State Scorecard Average

34%

Hawaii
2025 State Scorecard Average

98%

Idaho
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Illinois
2025 State Scorecard Average

81%

Indiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

22%

Iowa
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Kansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

23%

Kentucky
2025 State Scorecard Average

19%

Louisiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

38%

Maine
2025 State Scorecard Average

76%

Maryland
2025 State Scorecard Average

85%

Massachusetts
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Michigan
2025 State Scorecard Average

44%

Minnesota
2025 State Scorecard Average

50%

Mississippi
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Missouri
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Montana
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Nebraska
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Nevada
2025 State Scorecard Average

69%

New Hampshire
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

New Jersey
2025 State Scorecard Average

73%

New Mexico
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

New York
2025 State Scorecard Average

72%

North Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

26%

North Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2025 State Scorecard Average

33%

Oklahoma
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Oregon
2025 State Scorecard Average

82%

Pennsylvania
2025 State Scorecard Average

47%

Rhode Island
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

South Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

14%

South Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
2025 State Scorecard Average

10%

Texas
2025 State Scorecard Average

31%

Utah
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Vermont
2025 State Scorecard Average

100%

Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

58%

Washington
2025 State Scorecard Average

75%

West Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Wisconsin
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Wyoming
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%