Livestock Grazing on Public Land

House Roll Call Vote 465

1993 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

Yes

Votes For

314

Votes Against

109

Not Voting

10

The Clinton administration, with Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt in the lead, promised soon after taking office to reform the environmental abuses of livestock producers who graze their cattle and sheep on public land (see Senate vote Nos. 2-4). In the summer of 1993, a package of reforms was unveiled that included modest increases in the fees charged for the use of the land, moving them closer to fees charged on private land. Then on September 14, the Senate adopted an amendment to the 1994 Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations bill that would prevent the Department of Interior from implementing its reforms or increasing livestock grazing fees for one year (see Senate vote No. 2).

The House in the past four years has repeatedly endorsed rangeland reform and increased grazing fees. To reiterate House support for this policy, and allow the administration to proceed with its regulatory efforts, Rep. Ralph Regula (R-OH) offered a “Motion to Instruct the Conferees.” It would instruct the members who were representing the House in negotiations with the Senate over the Interior Departments spending bill to reject the Senate language. Passage of Regula’s motion would bring pressure on the Senate to reconsider Secretary Babbitt’s grazing reforms. It was approved 314-109 on September 29,1993. YES is the pro-environmental vote.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2025 State Scorecard Average

26%

Alaska
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Arizona
2025 State Scorecard Average

33%

Arkansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

California
2025 State Scorecard Average

78%

Colorado
2025 State Scorecard Average

51%

Connecticut
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Delaware
2025 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
2025 State Scorecard Average

28%

Georgia
2025 State Scorecard Average

34%

Hawaii
2025 State Scorecard Average

98%

Idaho
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Illinois
2025 State Scorecard Average

81%

Indiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

22%

Iowa
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Kansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

23%

Kentucky
2025 State Scorecard Average

19%

Louisiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

38%

Maine
2025 State Scorecard Average

76%

Maryland
2025 State Scorecard Average

85%

Massachusetts
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Michigan
2025 State Scorecard Average

44%

Minnesota
2025 State Scorecard Average

50%

Mississippi
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Missouri
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Montana
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Nebraska
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Nevada
2025 State Scorecard Average

69%

New Hampshire
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

New Jersey
2025 State Scorecard Average

73%

New Mexico
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

New York
2025 State Scorecard Average

72%

North Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

26%

North Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2025 State Scorecard Average

33%

Oklahoma
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Oregon
2025 State Scorecard Average

82%

Pennsylvania
2025 State Scorecard Average

47%

Rhode Island
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

South Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

14%

South Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
2025 State Scorecard Average

10%

Texas
2025 State Scorecard Average

31%

Utah
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Vermont
2025 State Scorecard Average

100%

Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

58%

Washington
2025 State Scorecard Average

75%

West Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Wisconsin
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Wyoming
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%