Logging Without Laws

House Roll Call Vote 262

1996 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

Yes

Votes For

209

Votes Against

211

Not Voting

14

Congress attached a rider to the 1995 Budget Rescissions Act to permit timber companies to purchase and log parcels in our national forests without regard to federal environmental laws. Logging without adequate environmental safeguards has ravaged old-growth and healthy, green trees under the guise of “salvaging” dead or diseased timber. It imperils fisheries, destroys habitat for endangered wildlife, degrades water quality in streams and rivers, and undermines commercial and sportfishing industries. The rider prevented legal challenges to these timber sales.

Reps. Elizabeth Furse (D-OR), John Edward Porter (R-IL), Sidney Yates (D-IL), and Constance Morena (R-MD) offered an amendment to H.R. 3662, the Fiscal Year 1997 Interior Appropriations Bill, to prohibit the spending of any 1997 funds for implementation of the 1995 salvage timber rider. On June 20, 1996, the House of Representatives defeated the Furse amendment, 209 – 211. YES is the pro-environment vote. (See Senate vote 2.)

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
1996 State Scorecard Average

15%

Alaska
1996 State Scorecard Average

58%

Arizona
1996 State Scorecard Average

30%

Arkansas
1996 State Scorecard Average

4%

California
1996 State Scorecard Average

75%

Colorado
1996 State Scorecard Average

52%

Connecticut
1996 State Scorecard Average

97%

Delaware
1996 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
1996 State Scorecard Average

30%

Georgia
1996 State Scorecard Average

35%

Hawaii
1996 State Scorecard Average

98%

Idaho
1996 State Scorecard Average

5%

Illinois
1996 State Scorecard Average

81%

Indiana
1996 State Scorecard Average

24%

Iowa
1996 State Scorecard Average

5%

Kansas
1996 State Scorecard Average

25%

Kentucky
1996 State Scorecard Average

20%

Louisiana
1996 State Scorecard Average

21%

Maine
1996 State Scorecard Average

71%

Maryland
1996 State Scorecard Average

83%

Massachusetts
1996 State Scorecard Average

96%

Michigan
1996 State Scorecard Average

54%

Minnesota
1996 State Scorecard Average

47%

Mississippi
1996 State Scorecard Average

24%

Missouri
1996 State Scorecard Average

21%

Montana
1996 State Scorecard Average

2%

Nebraska
1996 State Scorecard Average

4%

Nevada
1996 State Scorecard Average

72%

New Hampshire
1996 State Scorecard Average

88%

New Jersey
1996 State Scorecard Average

78%

New Mexico
1996 State Scorecard Average

94%

New York
1996 State Scorecard Average

63%

North Carolina
1996 State Scorecard Average

47%

North Dakota
1996 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
1996 State Scorecard Average

33%

Oklahoma
1996 State Scorecard Average

3%

Oregon
1996 State Scorecard Average

68%

Pennsylvania
1996 State Scorecard Average

56%

Rhode Island
1996 State Scorecard Average

100%

South Carolina
1996 State Scorecard Average

17%

South Dakota
1996 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
1996 State Scorecard Average

13%

Texas
1996 State Scorecard Average

33%

Utah
1996 State Scorecard Average

6%

Vermont
1996 State Scorecard Average

100%

Virginia
1996 State Scorecard Average

55%

Washington
1996 State Scorecard Average

72%

West Virginia
1996 State Scorecard Average

0%

Wisconsin
1996 State Scorecard Average

24%

Wyoming
1996 State Scorecard Average

3%