New Entitlements for Polluters

1994 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

No

Votes For

163

Votes Against

271

Issues

Rep. Billy Tauzin (D-LA) introduced the Private Property Owners Bill of Rights (H.R. 3875), which would require taxpayers to pay landowners whenever wetlands or endangered species laws were judged to reduce the potential value of the “”affected portion of the property”” by 50 percent. This proposal — which exemplifies the radical attack on environmental laws by those claiming to speak for landowners — would force taxpayers to pay landowners to obey public health and environmental laws even where no property has been “”taken”” under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution. Under this law, landowners would be free to pollute and destroy wetlands and endangered species habitat if taxpayers could not afford to pay. Moreover, the proposal ignores the fact that — over more than two centuries of American history — courts have developed adequate protections for people who have land “taken” by government.

While H.R. 3875 has been assigned to committee for study and deliberation, Rep. Tauzin has filed a “discharge petition” — if 218 House lawmakers sign the petition, the bill will be released directly to the House for a floor vote. This would preclude the careful analysis and opportunity for comment that such a complex — and far reaching — proposal demands.

The League of Conservation Voters considers cosponsoring H.R. 3875, and signing the discharge petition for the bill, to be anti-environmental actions. So far, 162 lawmakers have cosponsored H.R. 3875 and 146 lawmakers have signed the discharge petition.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2025 State Scorecard Average

26%

Alaska
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Arizona
2025 State Scorecard Average

33%

Arkansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

California
2025 State Scorecard Average

78%

Colorado
2025 State Scorecard Average

51%

Connecticut
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Delaware
2025 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
2025 State Scorecard Average

28%

Georgia
2025 State Scorecard Average

34%

Hawaii
2025 State Scorecard Average

98%

Idaho
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Illinois
2025 State Scorecard Average

81%

Indiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

22%

Iowa
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Kansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

23%

Kentucky
2025 State Scorecard Average

19%

Louisiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

38%

Maine
2025 State Scorecard Average

76%

Maryland
2025 State Scorecard Average

85%

Massachusetts
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Michigan
2025 State Scorecard Average

44%

Minnesota
2025 State Scorecard Average

50%

Mississippi
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Missouri
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Montana
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Nebraska
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Nevada
2025 State Scorecard Average

69%

New Hampshire
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

New Jersey
2025 State Scorecard Average

73%

New Mexico
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

New York
2025 State Scorecard Average

72%

North Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

26%

North Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2025 State Scorecard Average

33%

Oklahoma
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Oregon
2025 State Scorecard Average

82%

Pennsylvania
2025 State Scorecard Average

47%

Rhode Island
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

South Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

14%

South Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
2025 State Scorecard Average

10%

Texas
2025 State Scorecard Average

31%

Utah
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Vermont
2025 State Scorecard Average

100%

Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

58%

Washington
2025 State Scorecard Average

75%

West Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Wisconsin
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Wyoming
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%