Restricting World Heritage Sites and Biosphere Reserves

House Roll Call Vote 504

1997 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

No

Votes For

236

Votes Against

191

Not Voting

6

The United States is an influential leader in global conservation efforts. For 25 years it has been a leader in international efforts to protect natural and cultural resources through its participation in the World Heritage Convention and the U.S. Man and Biosphere Program. World Heritage sites are places that have been recognized as world-class natural and cultural resources worthy of preservation. Of the 20 World Heritage sites in the United States, 17 are national parks including Yellowstone, Grand Canyon, Independence Hall, and the Statue of Liberty. Biosphere Reserves are established to represent the world’s varied ecosystems and provide opportunities for scientific research and sustainable economic development. The 47 Biosphere Reserves in the United States include 30 national parks, among them, Glacier and Rocky Mountain National Parks. Both programs promote worldwide protection of natural and cultural resources by enhancing public awareness and facilitating greater international scientific cooperation.

International research and recognition has benefited many of the designated areas. Designations are issued by the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) only upon request of the local community and country in which the site is located.

In May and June 1997, the Congressional Research Service issued fact sheets on the programs, confirming that the United Nations has no control or jurisdiction over designated sites. Nonetheless, Rep. Don Young (R-AK) introduced H.R. 901, “The American Land Sovereignty Protection Act,” claiming that participation in these U.N.-sponsored programs threatens American sovereignty and private property rights. H.R. 901 severely hinders the ability of the United States to exercise its leadership in the global conservation movement by restricting U.S. participation in these programs. The bill requires that any new World Heritage site be authorized by a specific act of Congress, ends U.S. participation in the Man and Biosphere program, and rescinds the existing 47 Biosphere Reserve designations unless each site is individually authorized by Congress before 2001.

Rep. Young’s efforts to pass H.R. 901 were initially derailed when Reps. George Miller (D-CA) and Bruce Vento (D-MN) coordinated an effort to have Members of Congress offer amendments to specifically protect Biosphere Reserves located in their districts. Rep. Young responded by getting the House leadership to drastically restrict debate on the bill and to limit the number and type of amendments that could be offered. As reported in the October 7 Congressional Record, he then portrayed the vote as a test of a Congressman’s patriotism, at one point admonishing his colleagues that “if they do not support this bill, they are against the Constitution.”

On October 8, 1997, the House passed H.R. 901, 236 – 191. NO is the pro-environment vote.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2025 State Scorecard Average

26%

Alaska
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Arizona
2025 State Scorecard Average

33%

Arkansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

California
2025 State Scorecard Average

78%

Colorado
2025 State Scorecard Average

51%

Connecticut
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Delaware
2025 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
2025 State Scorecard Average

28%

Georgia
2025 State Scorecard Average

34%

Hawaii
2025 State Scorecard Average

98%

Idaho
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Illinois
2025 State Scorecard Average

81%

Indiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

22%

Iowa
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Kansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

23%

Kentucky
2025 State Scorecard Average

19%

Louisiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

38%

Maine
2025 State Scorecard Average

76%

Maryland
2025 State Scorecard Average

85%

Massachusetts
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Michigan
2025 State Scorecard Average

44%

Minnesota
2025 State Scorecard Average

50%

Mississippi
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Missouri
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Montana
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Nebraska
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Nevada
2025 State Scorecard Average

69%

New Hampshire
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

New Jersey
2025 State Scorecard Average

73%

New Mexico
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

New York
2025 State Scorecard Average

72%

North Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

26%

North Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2025 State Scorecard Average

33%

Oklahoma
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Oregon
2025 State Scorecard Average

82%

Pennsylvania
2025 State Scorecard Average

47%

Rhode Island
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

South Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

14%

South Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
2025 State Scorecard Average

10%

Texas
2025 State Scorecard Average

31%

Utah
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Vermont
2025 State Scorecard Average

100%

Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

58%

Washington
2025 State Scorecard Average

75%

West Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Wisconsin
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Wyoming
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%