Trade and Environment

House Roll Call Vote 370

2002 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

No

Votes For

215

Votes Against

212

Not Voting

7

Issues

As trade has become an increasingly vital component of the global economy, important policy decisions on such issues as marine species conservation and sustainable forestry practices are increasingly being made in the context of international trade agreements and institutions. These bodies often fail to incorporate environmental concerns in their decisions and have, in some cases, rejected environmental and public health protections as barriers to trade.

This issue came to a head during the House debate over “Fast Track” trade legislation. Fast Track authority allows the President to negotiate trade agreements with expedited procedures for approval or disapproval by Congress. Congress agrees to consider the trade agreements under a procedure with mandatory deadlines, no amendments, limited debate, and an up-or-down vote. In exchange, Congress is permitted to set negotiating objectives, conditions for approving agreements, and guidelines for any changes to domestic law.

Fast Track authority lapsed in 1994. The environmental community supports a consensus-based Fast Track authority that would encourage environmental protection and guard against weakening environmental standards while still promoting economic growth. Such was not the case with the Trade Act of 2002 (H.R. 3009), which was opposed by conservationists for failing to address key environmental provisions in a meaningful manner and for failing to encourage real environmental progress and cooperation with trading partners. The bill also failed to ensure that provisions such as Chapter 11 of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which grant foreign corporations broad powers to sue U.S. taxpayers for damages if U.S. environmental, health or land protection laws interfere with the corporations’ business, are not included in future trade deals.

On July 27, 2002, the House adopted the H.R. 3009 conference report by a 215-212 vote (House roll call vote 370). NO is the pro-environment vote. The bill was adopted by the Senate on August 1, 2002, and signed into law by President Bush the next day.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2002 State Scorecard Average

15%

Alaska
2002 State Scorecard Average

58%

Arizona
2002 State Scorecard Average

30%

Arkansas
2002 State Scorecard Average

4%

California
2002 State Scorecard Average

75%

Colorado
2002 State Scorecard Average

52%

Connecticut
2002 State Scorecard Average

97%

Delaware
2002 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
2002 State Scorecard Average

30%

Georgia
2002 State Scorecard Average

35%

Hawaii
2002 State Scorecard Average

98%

Idaho
2002 State Scorecard Average

5%

Illinois
2002 State Scorecard Average

81%

Indiana
2002 State Scorecard Average

24%

Iowa
2002 State Scorecard Average

5%

Kansas
2002 State Scorecard Average

25%

Kentucky
2002 State Scorecard Average

20%

Louisiana
2002 State Scorecard Average

21%

Maine
2002 State Scorecard Average

71%

Maryland
2002 State Scorecard Average

83%

Massachusetts
2002 State Scorecard Average

96%

Michigan
2002 State Scorecard Average

54%

Minnesota
2002 State Scorecard Average

47%

Mississippi
2002 State Scorecard Average

24%

Missouri
2002 State Scorecard Average

21%

Montana
2002 State Scorecard Average

2%

Nebraska
2002 State Scorecard Average

4%

Nevada
2002 State Scorecard Average

72%

New Hampshire
2002 State Scorecard Average

88%

New Jersey
2002 State Scorecard Average

78%

New Mexico
2002 State Scorecard Average

94%

New York
2002 State Scorecard Average

63%

North Carolina
2002 State Scorecard Average

47%

North Dakota
2002 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2002 State Scorecard Average

33%

Oklahoma
2002 State Scorecard Average

3%

Oregon
2002 State Scorecard Average

68%

Pennsylvania
2002 State Scorecard Average

56%

Rhode Island
2002 State Scorecard Average

100%

South Carolina
2002 State Scorecard Average

17%

South Dakota
2002 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
2002 State Scorecard Average

13%

Texas
2002 State Scorecard Average

33%

Utah
2002 State Scorecard Average

6%

Vermont
2002 State Scorecard Average

100%

Virginia
2002 State Scorecard Average

55%

Washington
2002 State Scorecard Average

72%

West Virginia
2002 State Scorecard Average

0%

Wisconsin
2002 State Scorecard Average

24%

Wyoming
2002 State Scorecard Average

3%