Anti-Environment Riders I

House Roll Call Vote 5

1996 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

No

Votes For

239

Votes Against

177

Not Voting

16

Much of the 104th Congress’s assault on the environment has been pursued through policy “riders” attached to spending and revenue bills necessary to keep the government operating. On December 18, 1995, President Clinton vetoed the Fiscal Year 1996 Interior Appropriations Bill, H.R. 1977, in part because of anti-environmental riders attached to it. Among the most controversial were: (1) a moratorium on listing for protection any additional threatened and endangered species; (2) a timber plan allowing excessive logging of Alaskas Tongass National Forest, one of the world’s few remaining temperate rain forests; (3) an effort to nullify portions of the California Desert Protection Act by stripping away management of the Mojave National Preserve from the National Park Service; and (4) restrictions on energy efficiency and conservation programs.

To override a presidential veto, the House and Senate must each pass the vetoed legislation by a two-thirds majority of present and voting members. On January 4, 1996, the House of Representatives failed to override the Presidents veto of H.R. 1977, 239 – 177. NO is the pro-environment vote.

These provisions resurfaced in H.R. 3019, the Fiscal Year 1996 Omnibus Rescissions and Appropriations Bill, but they were either dropped during the House-Senate Conference or the President was given authority to waive them.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2025 State Scorecard Average

26%

Alaska
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Arizona
2025 State Scorecard Average

33%

Arkansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

California
2025 State Scorecard Average

78%

Colorado
2025 State Scorecard Average

51%

Connecticut
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Delaware
2025 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
2025 State Scorecard Average

28%

Georgia
2025 State Scorecard Average

34%

Hawaii
2025 State Scorecard Average

98%

Idaho
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Illinois
2025 State Scorecard Average

81%

Indiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

22%

Iowa
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Kansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

23%

Kentucky
2025 State Scorecard Average

19%

Louisiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

38%

Maine
2025 State Scorecard Average

76%

Maryland
2025 State Scorecard Average

85%

Massachusetts
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Michigan
2025 State Scorecard Average

44%

Minnesota
2025 State Scorecard Average

50%

Mississippi
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Missouri
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Montana
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Nebraska
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Nevada
2025 State Scorecard Average

69%

New Hampshire
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

New Jersey
2025 State Scorecard Average

73%

New Mexico
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

New York
2025 State Scorecard Average

72%

North Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

26%

North Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2025 State Scorecard Average

33%

Oklahoma
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Oregon
2025 State Scorecard Average

82%

Pennsylvania
2025 State Scorecard Average

47%

Rhode Island
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

South Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

14%

South Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
2025 State Scorecard Average

10%

Texas
2025 State Scorecard Average

31%

Utah
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Vermont
2025 State Scorecard Average

100%

Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

58%

Washington
2025 State Scorecard Average

75%

West Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Wisconsin
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Wyoming
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%