Anti-Environment Riders I

House Roll Call Vote 5

1996 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

No

Votes For

239

Votes Against

177

Not Voting

16

Much of the 104th Congress’s assault on the environment has been pursued through policy “riders” attached to spending and revenue bills necessary to keep the government operating. On December 18, 1995, President Clinton vetoed the Fiscal Year 1996 Interior Appropriations Bill, H.R. 1977, in part because of anti-environmental riders attached to it. Among the most controversial were: (1) a moratorium on listing for protection any additional threatened and endangered species; (2) a timber plan allowing excessive logging of Alaskas Tongass National Forest, one of the world’s few remaining temperate rain forests; (3) an effort to nullify portions of the California Desert Protection Act by stripping away management of the Mojave National Preserve from the National Park Service; and (4) restrictions on energy efficiency and conservation programs.

To override a presidential veto, the House and Senate must each pass the vetoed legislation by a two-thirds majority of present and voting members. On January 4, 1996, the House of Representatives failed to override the Presidents veto of H.R. 1977, 239 – 177. NO is the pro-environment vote.

These provisions resurfaced in H.R. 3019, the Fiscal Year 1996 Omnibus Rescissions and Appropriations Bill, but they were either dropped during the House-Senate Conference or the President was given authority to waive them.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
1996 State Scorecard Average

15%

Alaska
1996 State Scorecard Average

58%

Arizona
1996 State Scorecard Average

30%

Arkansas
1996 State Scorecard Average

4%

California
1996 State Scorecard Average

75%

Colorado
1996 State Scorecard Average

52%

Connecticut
1996 State Scorecard Average

97%

Delaware
1996 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
1996 State Scorecard Average

30%

Georgia
1996 State Scorecard Average

35%

Hawaii
1996 State Scorecard Average

98%

Idaho
1996 State Scorecard Average

5%

Illinois
1996 State Scorecard Average

81%

Indiana
1996 State Scorecard Average

24%

Iowa
1996 State Scorecard Average

5%

Kansas
1996 State Scorecard Average

25%

Kentucky
1996 State Scorecard Average

20%

Louisiana
1996 State Scorecard Average

21%

Maine
1996 State Scorecard Average

71%

Maryland
1996 State Scorecard Average

83%

Massachusetts
1996 State Scorecard Average

96%

Michigan
1996 State Scorecard Average

54%

Minnesota
1996 State Scorecard Average

47%

Mississippi
1996 State Scorecard Average

24%

Missouri
1996 State Scorecard Average

21%

Montana
1996 State Scorecard Average

2%

Nebraska
1996 State Scorecard Average

4%

Nevada
1996 State Scorecard Average

72%

New Hampshire
1996 State Scorecard Average

88%

New Jersey
1996 State Scorecard Average

78%

New Mexico
1996 State Scorecard Average

94%

New York
1996 State Scorecard Average

63%

North Carolina
1996 State Scorecard Average

47%

North Dakota
1996 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
1996 State Scorecard Average

33%

Oklahoma
1996 State Scorecard Average

3%

Oregon
1996 State Scorecard Average

68%

Pennsylvania
1996 State Scorecard Average

56%

Rhode Island
1996 State Scorecard Average

100%

South Carolina
1996 State Scorecard Average

17%

South Dakota
1996 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
1996 State Scorecard Average

13%

Texas
1996 State Scorecard Average

33%

Utah
1996 State Scorecard Average

6%

Vermont
1996 State Scorecard Average

100%

Virginia
1996 State Scorecard Average

55%

Washington
1996 State Scorecard Average

72%

West Virginia
1996 State Scorecard Average

0%

Wisconsin
1996 State Scorecard Average

24%

Wyoming
1996 State Scorecard Average

3%