California Desert Protection Act

House Roll Call Vote 420

1991 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

No

Votes For

150

Votes Against

241

Not Voting

43

This landmark legislation sponsored by Representatives Mel Levine (D CA-27), Richard Lehman (D CA-18), and George Miller (D CA-18) is one of the most comprehensive land protection measures to come before Congress since the passage of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act in 1980. The California Desert Protection Act, H.R. 2929, would create a new 1.5 million acre national monument, for administration by the National Park Service, from the existing East Mojave National Scenic Area which is currently managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). H.R. 2929 would also designate 73 BLM areas totaling 4.1 million acres as BLM wilderness. Additionally, H.R. 2929 calls for the creation of two national parks from the existing Joshua Tree and Death Valley National Monuments and expands the boundaries beyond the present Monument areas. These park and wilderness designations would ensure that the fragile and unique natural ecosystems of the desert are preserved for all future generations.

Representative Jerry Lewis (R CA-35) offered a substitute to the California Desert Protection Act, which would have designated only 2.3 million acres as wilderness, instead of the more than 7.5 million acres of new protected areas under the original legislation. The Lewis Substitute (H.R. 3066) is based on BLM’s recommendations for wilderness, as well as its management plan for the California Desert Conservation Area; the plan repeatedly ranked mining, grazing, and motorized recreation over wildlife protection. In the Lewis Substitute, too few areas are designated as wilderness, and the areas are too small and widely scattered to sustain ecosystems. These small “islands” of protected natural desert landscapes would eventually be isolated by a sea of development and increasing environmental impacts.

In protecting virtually every resource, the Lewis Substitute would fall short; thousands of archaeological sites and millions of acres of vital wildlife habitat would be left vulnerable under this substitute. For example, while H.R. 2929 provides wilderness protection for 51 areas with important desert tortoise habitat, the Lewis Substitute would only protect the tortoise habitat in nine of these areas. Moreover, the Lewis Substitute failed to designate the Death Valley and Joshua Tree National Monuments as national parks. Most significantly, the Lewis Substitute failed to remove the East Mojave from BLM management and place it under the National Park Service’s jurisdiction, despite the analysis and recommendations of personnel in both agencies, whose studies found the area qualified for inclusion in the Park Service.

The Lewis Substitute Amendment was defeated 150-241 on November 22, 1991. NO is the pro-environment vote.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2025 State Scorecard Average

26%

Alaska
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Arizona
2025 State Scorecard Average

33%

Arkansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

California
2025 State Scorecard Average

78%

Colorado
2025 State Scorecard Average

51%

Connecticut
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Delaware
2025 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
2025 State Scorecard Average

28%

Georgia
2025 State Scorecard Average

34%

Hawaii
2025 State Scorecard Average

98%

Idaho
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Illinois
2025 State Scorecard Average

81%

Indiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

22%

Iowa
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Kansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

23%

Kentucky
2025 State Scorecard Average

19%

Louisiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

38%

Maine
2025 State Scorecard Average

76%

Maryland
2025 State Scorecard Average

85%

Massachusetts
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Michigan
2025 State Scorecard Average

44%

Minnesota
2025 State Scorecard Average

50%

Mississippi
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Missouri
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Montana
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Nebraska
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Nevada
2025 State Scorecard Average

69%

New Hampshire
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

New Jersey
2025 State Scorecard Average

73%

New Mexico
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

New York
2025 State Scorecard Average

72%

North Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

26%

North Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2025 State Scorecard Average

33%

Oklahoma
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Oregon
2025 State Scorecard Average

82%

Pennsylvania
2025 State Scorecard Average

47%

Rhode Island
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

South Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

14%

South Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
2025 State Scorecard Average

10%

Texas
2025 State Scorecard Average

31%

Utah
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Vermont
2025 State Scorecard Average

100%

Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

58%

Washington
2025 State Scorecard Average

75%

West Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Wisconsin
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Wyoming
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%