Endangered Species Act Flood Waivers

House Roll Call Vote 108

1997 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

Yes

Votes For

227

Votes Against

196

Not Voting

10

Following a series of disastrous floods in California, Reps. Richard Pombo (R-CA) and Wally Herger (R-CA) introduced H.R. 478, the “Flood Prevention and Family Protection Act of 1997,” to exempt nearly all flood control activities from compliance with the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The ESA requires that flood control projects undergo a review to ensure they do not harm endangered plants, fish, or wildlife. The review can be expedited in the case of an impending emergency. Despite the lack of any credible evidence linking the floods to ESA requirements, Reps. Pombo and Herger claimed that the ESA review process caused levee maintenance delays that contributed to levee breaks during the floods and, consequently, such maintenance should be exempted from the ESA review process. However, H.R. 478 was written so broadly that it would exempt virtually any project related to flood control, including levees, canals, dredging, draining wetlands — even massive dams in the West — from the requirement to consider impacts on endangered species. Because many endangered species live in or along waterways, the bill would substantially undermine the Act.

On May 7, 1997, Rep. Sherwood Boehlert (R-NY) offered an amendment that significantly narrowed H.R. 478 to exempt only project repairs in federally declared disaster areas or when there is a substantial threat to human lives and property. The exemption would expire at the end of 1998. Rep. Boehlert’s amendment was supported by a bipartisan coalition similar to that which defeated numerous anti-environmental measures in the 104th Congress. The House approved the Boehlert amendment 227 – 196. YES is the pro-environment vote.

Before H.R. 478 could come to a final vote, its supporters pulled the amended bill from the floor rather than see it pass. This would allow them to consider the bill later if they could convince enough of their colleagues to change their vote so that Reps. Pombo and Berger’s version of the bill would pass. However, in the Senate, Sen. Larry Craig (R-ID) inserted language similar to H.R. 478 into S. 672, the Emergency Supplemental appropriations bill, to provide disaster relief for flood victims. After several Senators expressed concern over the Craig provision, a narrower version — similar to the Boehlert language — was accepted by unanimous consent (without a vote) in the Senate. S. 672 passed Congress and was signed into law by President Clinton on June 12, 1997.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2025 State Scorecard Average

26%

Alaska
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Arizona
2025 State Scorecard Average

33%

Arkansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

California
2025 State Scorecard Average

78%

Colorado
2025 State Scorecard Average

51%

Connecticut
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Delaware
2025 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
2025 State Scorecard Average

28%

Georgia
2025 State Scorecard Average

34%

Hawaii
2025 State Scorecard Average

98%

Idaho
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Illinois
2025 State Scorecard Average

81%

Indiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

22%

Iowa
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Kansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

23%

Kentucky
2025 State Scorecard Average

19%

Louisiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

38%

Maine
2025 State Scorecard Average

76%

Maryland
2025 State Scorecard Average

85%

Massachusetts
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Michigan
2025 State Scorecard Average

44%

Minnesota
2025 State Scorecard Average

50%

Mississippi
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Missouri
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Montana
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Nebraska
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Nevada
2025 State Scorecard Average

69%

New Hampshire
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

New Jersey
2025 State Scorecard Average

73%

New Mexico
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

New York
2025 State Scorecard Average

72%

North Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

26%

North Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2025 State Scorecard Average

33%

Oklahoma
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Oregon
2025 State Scorecard Average

82%

Pennsylvania
2025 State Scorecard Average

47%

Rhode Island
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

South Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

14%

South Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
2025 State Scorecard Average

10%

Texas
2025 State Scorecard Average

31%

Utah
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Vermont
2025 State Scorecard Average

100%

Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

58%

Washington
2025 State Scorecard Average

75%

West Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Wisconsin
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Wyoming
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%